Attrove AI

Attrove AI

Attrove AI watches commitments made in email, chat, and meetings and alerts an owner when the work goes quiet.

82/100Safe BetFree · from $99/moFreemium

Most tools tell you what was said; Attrove tells you what stopped moving, and it hands you the sender, snippet, and link as proof. The metering model is the quiet win — 5 connected users and 500 AI queries free, then $99/mo, with Goals, commitments, and webhooks never billed. Buy it if silence is your problem. Skip it if you need a system that sends the chase email itself.

Verified 1d ago · liveness 82/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/attrove-ai

Best for
  • Customer-facing operators tracking renewals, handoffs, and client promises that go quiet
  • AI product teams embedding commitment monitoring via MCP, SDK, and per-user OAuth
  • Small teams that need to stop dropping conversations without buying a CRM
  • Sales and success orgs that want cited evidence attached to every escalation
Not ideal for
  • Teams wanting a full CRM or project management replacement
  • Anyone who needs automatic message sending without a human deciding
  • Microsoft Teams-first organizations, since that connector is still in pilot
Visit Website

IntermediateUsing it yourself in an agent is roughly two minutes: run npx @attrove/cli install for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or Claude Desktop, sign in once, and your workspace is created on the spot — no dashboard stop required since the 2026-09-01 agent-first activation release. Building it into your own product is a four-step path in TypeScript, Python, or cURL (provision a user, create a connectWeb · API · CLI · PluginAPI availableVerified 1d ago
Pricing
Free · from $99/mo
FreemiumFree tier4 plans6 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
Using it yourself in an agent is roughly two minutes: run npx @attrove/cli install for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or Claude Desktop, sign in once, and your workspace is created on the spot — no dashboard stop required since the 2026-09-01 agent-first activation release. Building it into your own product is a four-step path in TypeScript, Python, or cURL (provision a user, create a connect
Runs on
WebAPICLIPlugin
API available · 6 integrations
Who it's for
Customer success lead at a 40-person B2B software companyDeveloper embedding monitoring into an AI productOps generalist at a small agency with no CRM
Live sentiment
Is Attrove AI actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Attrove if you need the tool to send the follow-up message itself rather than flag it, or if your team lives in Microsoft Teams — that connector is still in pilot.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Growth includes 25 connected users, then adds $5 per extra user per month with a hard cap at 50 — a growing revenue team can hit that ceiling before it expects to.

Price reality

Free at $0/mo fits a single team testing 5 connected users and 500 AI queries. Growth at $99/mo fits one production revenue team at 25 connected users. Scale at $499/mo fits a multi-workspace org at 100 connected users and 50,000 queries. Past that you are in Enterprise terms. Against a CRM seat stack this is cheap; against a pure search add-on it costs more, but Goals and Commitments are never metered on any plan.

In short

Attrove AI — Attrove AI watches commitments made in email, chat, and meetings and alerts an owner when the work goes quiet. Best for Customer-facing operators tracking renewals, handoffs, and client promises that go quiet, AI product teams embedding commitment monitoring via MCP, SDK, and per-user OAuth, Small teams that need to stop dropping conversations without buying a CRM. Free to start; paid plans from $99/mo.

What's new in Attrove AI

Checked 7 days ago

Across the latest 4 updates: 3 feature updates and 1 launch.

What people actually say about Attrove AI — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

11 mentions across 2 sources (Product Hunt, Bluesky) · researched Jul 4, 2026.

65% positive35% critical

Average across the 2 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.

Recurring strengths
  • +Proactive monitoring catches dropped balls across email, chat, and meetings.
  • +Daily briefs and rising topic tracking reduce morning context-switching overhead.
  • +Goal-based alerts include cited evidence: sender, snippet, and direct link.
  • +Natural language query works across all connected data sources seamlessly.
  • +Read-only design with human-in-the-loop prevents accidental automated actions.
Recurring frustrations
  • −Alert prioritization and mute controls are unclear in practice.
  • −No automated action execution — only suggests next steps.
  • −Limited community feedback — only 10 product hunt reviews.
  • −Comparison to Copilot/Gemini unanswered: differentiation still fuzzy.
  • −No long-term user data: reliability at scale is unproven.
Patterns worth knowing
Proactive monitoring is the key selling point, with users excited about catching overlooked items.
Seen on Product Hunt
Concerns about alert fatigue and noise filtering dominate early questions.
Seen on Product Hunt
Comparison to existing tools like Copilot and Gemini is a recurring question with no clear answer.
Seen on Product Hunt
Learning curve
beginnerProductive in ~A few hours
Hidden costs people mention
  • • No hidden costs mentioned in community data, but per-user per-query pricing could be expensive at scale.

Viability Score

82/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Attrove AI? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
97
Site health
95
User sentiment
65
What the vendor publishes
60

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Watches Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Google Calendar, and Google Meet via read-scoped OAuth
  • Microsoft Teams connector in pilot
  • Records commitments with a counterparty, expected signal, and horizon
  • Rolls related commitments and cited evidence into a Goal with health and owner
  • Alerts carry cited evidence: sender, snippet, and source link
  • Daily Catch Brief lists what's waiting on others, what's waiting on you, and what's slipping
  • First sync proposes 3-5 reviewable outcome watches with confidence labels
  • Signed push ingestion for sources beyond the built-in connectors
  • REST API, TypeScript SDK, MCP server (23 tools), and webhooks
  • MCP tools: attrove_watch_commitment, attrove_check_my_outcomes, attrove_resolve_commitment
  • Agent-first activation: attrove_connect returns one connect link mid-conversation
  • First-use OAuth on a hosted MCP client provisions the account automatically
  • Classifier separates bulk delivery from real bot signals
  • Natural-language search across connected sources with source snippets returned
  • Read-only design with SOC 2 Type I and revocable source access

About Attrove AI

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableWeb · API · CLI · Plugin

Attrove AI is a commitment monitoring tool: it watches the promises your team makes in email, chat, and meetings, and surfaces the ones that stop moving. Each commitment is logged with a counterparty, an expected signal, and a horizon. Related commitments and their evidence roll up into a Goal with a computed health status, an owner, and a recommended next action. A commitment that silently never resolves emails the accountable human instead of vanishing into a thread. The pitch is aimed at customer-facing operators — renewals, handoffs, client promises — plus AI product teams who want to embed commitment monitoring. Sources connect once through read-scoped OAuth for Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Google Calendar, and Google Meet, or signed push ingestion for anything outside that set. Microsoft Teams is in pilot. Each user's view is normalized, citations stay intact, and everything flows out through the REST API, TypeScript SDK, MCP server, and webhooks. The developer surface carries real weight. Commitments went generally available in July 2026 on the API, SDK, MCP, and dashboard, and the MCP server ships 23 tools including attrove_watch_commitment, attrove_check_my_outcomes, and attrove_resolve_commitment. Agent-first activation arrived 2026-09-01: attrove_connect returns a single link an MCP client can hand the user mid-conversation, and first-use OAuth on a hosted client provisions the account automatically. A first sync also proposes three to five reviewable outcome watches with named parties and confidence labels, and a Daily Catch Brief lists what's waiting on others, what's waiting on you, and what's already slipping. Read-only and human-in-the-loop by design — Attrove reads, analyzes, and watches; a person decides what to send. It complements a CRM or project tool rather than replacing one. Metering is narrow: connected users and AI queries. Goals, commitments, evaluations, connectors, webhooks, sync, and indexing aren't counted, which keeps a pilot cheap to

Behind the Verdict

Here's the gap Attrove is aiming at: your CRM holds what was promised, search finds what was said, and neither notices when the follow-up never happened. In practice the misses that cost you a renewal are rarely loud — they're a thread that just stops. Attrove's whole job is catching that, and the citation attached to every escalation (sender, snippet, link) is what makes the alert actionable rather than another notification to dismiss. Pick it when you run customer-facing operations with a lot of parallel handoffs, or when you're building an AI product that should know which promises are still outstanding. The MCP side is further along than most agent integrations at this stage — agent-first activation means a user can link Gmail or Slack from inside a conversation without ever opening a dashboard, and 23 MCP tools plus webhooks give you somewhere to build. Pass when you want automation that closes the loop. Attrove deliberately won't send on your behalf; it suggests the next move with proof and waits for a human. Commitments escalate by email, and there are no partner webhook events for them yet. If your org lives in Teams, note the connector is still in pilot — Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Calendar, and Meet are the live ones. Watch the usage math before you commit to a tier. Growth at $99/mo covers 25 connected users and 5,000 AI queries, then $5 per extra user and $0.01 per extra query, with hard caps at 50 users and 10,000 queries. Scale at $499/mo gives 100 users and 50,000 queries, overage at $3 and $0.008, capped at 200 users and 100,000 queries. Those caps are the real ceiling — a large org will hit them and end up talking to the team. We'd start on Free with one revenue team: 5 connected users and 500 AI queries, nothing billed, no card. Run the first sync,

Researching Attrove AI? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Attrove AI actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Customer success lead at a 40-person B2B software company

Connect Gmail, Slack, and Google Calendar read-only, let the first sync propose 3-5 outcome watches grounded in open commitments, then approve the renewal ones.

Outcome: Each watch names the counterparty and horizon; when a renewal thread goes quiet past the silence condition, the accountable rep gets an email with the sender, snippet, and source link attached.

Developer embedding monitoring into an AI product

Provision a user with admin.users.create(), create a connect session so they link Gmail, Slack, and calendar, then call goals.create() with a silence condition and subscribe a webhook to goals.risk_detected.

Outcome: The end user connects through one link with no dashboard trip, and your own system receives a signed event with the goal, a health snapshot, and cited evidence when the work goes quiet.

Ops generalist at a small agency with no CRM

Ask the MCP client 'What needs my attention this week?' and check the Daily Catch Brief each morning.

Outcome: A short list of outcomes waiting on someone else, promises waiting on the recipient, and commitments already slipping — delivered without a dashboard login.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

attrove-co-pilotClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o

as of 2026-10-18

Limitations

  • Attrove is read-only and human-in-the-loop: it watches commitments and cites evidence, but a person decides what happens next, so it will not act on an alert for you.
  • Microsoft Teams remains in pilot, alongside the live Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Google Calendar, and Google Meet sources.
  • Plans are metered only on connected users and AI queries (plus workspace seats), with hard caps on the Free, Growth, and Scale tiers; usage beyond Scale's caps (200 connected users, 100,000 AI queries) requires custom Enterprise terms.
  • The dashboard is optional — setup and use are routed through agents, MCP, APIs, SDK, and CLI.

as of 2026-10-11

Verification history

We have re-verified Attrove AI 11 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 11 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Attrove AI tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free

$0/mo

Ideal for

A single team or solo operator who wants to watch first outcomes with real users before spending anything — 5 connected users and 500 AI queries a month, no card required.

What this tier adds

Starting tier: 5 connected users (stops at 10), 500 AI queries a month (stops at 1,000), plus Goals, Commitments, API, MCP, and webhooks included. Nothing is billed on this plan.

Growth

$99/mo

Ideal for

A product integration moving into production at one company, or a revenue team of roughly 10-25 people whose mail and Slack Attrove needs to read.

What this tier adds

Adds 25 connected users (then $5 per extra user, hard cap at 50), 5,000 AI queries a month (then $0.01 each, cap 10,000), and 1 Slack or Teams workspace context with 50 seats; $99/mo, cancel anytime.

Scale

$499/mo

Ideal for

A multi-team or multi-workspace organization running 50-200 connected users and querying the stream heavily, self-served from the dashboard.

What this tier adds

Adds 100 connected users (then $3 per extra user, cap 200), 50,000 AI queries a month (then $0.008 each, cap 100,000), and 5 workspace contexts with 500 seats; $499/mo.

Enterprise

Custom

Ideal for

Organizations past Scale's 200 connected user and 100,000 AI query caps, or teams that need hands-on workflow implementation rather than self-serve setup.

What this tier adds

Terms agreed separately and scoped with Attrove directly, including hands-on workflow implementations scoped separately from the self-serve plans.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Growth includes 25 connected users, then adds $5 per extra user per month with a hard cap at 50 — a growing revenue team can hit that ceiling before it expects to.
  • Scale drops the per-user overage to $3 but caps at 200 connected users and 100,000 AI queries, so anything past that means custom Enterprise terms rather than a self-serve upgrade.
  • Workspace seats are separate from connected users: $1 per extra seat beyond the included 50 on Growth and 500 on Scale.
  • Growth's workspace context is limited to one Slack or Teams workspace; Scale includes 5, so multi-workspace orgs pay the jump rather than an add-on.
  • Hands-on workflow setup is scoped separately from the self-serve plans even though describing the miss on the Workflows page gets a person's reply.
  • Extra AI queries bill at $0.01 each on Growth and $0.008 each on Scale, which only matters if your agents query the stream heavily — free accounts simply stop at 1,000.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Attrove AI's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Free at $0/mo fits a single team testing 5 connected users and 500 AI queries. Growth at $99/mo fits one production revenue team at 25 connected users. Scale at $499/mo fits a multi-workspace org at 100 connected users and 50,000 queries. Past that you are in Enterprise terms. Against a CRM seat stack this is cheap; against a pure search add-on it costs more, but Goals and Commitments are never metered on any plan.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Attrove AI — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Using it yourself in an agent is roughly two minutes: run npx @attrove/cli install for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or Claude Desktop, sign in once, and your workspace is created on the spot — no dashboard stop required since the 2026-09-01 agent-first activation release. Building it into your own product is a four-step path in TypeScript, Python, or cURL (provision a user, create a connect

Switching to or from Attrove AI

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From a CRM: keep your CRM as the record of deals and connect Attrove to Gmail, Slack, and calendar so commitments get watched instead of logged.
  • →From manual follow-up trackers or spreadsheet promise lists: register commitments through the API with a counterparty, signal, and horizon, then let escalation email the accountable owner.
  • →From email reminder tools: replace 'remind me in 3 days' rules with a Goal silence condition such as quietAfterDays: 5 that fires on the actual signal.
  • →From building your own reminder logic: use attrove_watch_commitment in an MCP client or commitments.watch() in the SDK rather than maintaining the detection layer.
Migrating out
  • ↗To a CRM with commitment tracking: export open commitments via GET /v1/users/:user_id/commitments (cursor pagination, 100 rows per page) before you leave, since resolved history is not listable.
  • ↗To a message-sending automation tool: Attrove will not send on your behalf, so pair it with your sender or rebuild the chase sequence there.
  • ↗To a self-hosted deployment: Attrove has no on-premise option, so that move means a different vendor rather than a different plan.

Integrations

GmailOutlookSlackMicrosoft TeamsGoogle CalendarGoogle Meet

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Attrove AI”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Attrove AI” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Attrove AI.

Tools that pair well with Attrove AI

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Attrove AI, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Attrove AI

View all
Scape

Scape

Scape is a Mac email client that drafts replies from your inbox and meetings and records calls locally.

FreemiumTry
Notta

Notta

AI note taker that transcribes 58 languages and turns meetings into slides and infographics

FreemiumTry
Voicenotes

Voicenotes

Voicenotes is a bot-free AI notetaker that records meetings on your own device and hands you the summary before you hang up.

FreemiumTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Attrove AI? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.