Bagasura
Bugasura is an agentic QA platform that runs context-driven AI testing agents and bug tracking on a free-forever tier for unlimited users.
Start with the MCP server into Claude or Cursor — if your developers already live in those editors, that's the shortest path to value, and it sits on the free tier. The free-forever plan's real strength isn't the $0 price but unlimited users, unlimited bug reports and uncapped Asura runs; the one ceiling that bites is 50 GB of attachment storage. Budget for Custom pricing the moment you need Testpert AI, Eagle Eye, SSO/SAML, on-prem or private AI mode — those are gated, and the free tier is
Verified 3d ago · liveness 73/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/bagasura
- Startups and mid-size engineering teams that want AI-assisted QA without per-seat costs
- Teams using Claude or Cursor that want quality context and defect history inside the editor
- QA teams piloting AI testing agents before committing automation budget
- Product teams tracking traceability from requirement to test execution and coverage change
- Teams whose bug tracking is already covered by GitHub Issues or a lightweight tracker
- Organizations needing heavily parameterized manual test-case management
- Teams standardized on an all-in-one ALM suite like Jira with Zephyr for test management
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Bugasura if your team needs heavily parameterized manual test-case management, an all-in-one ALM suite, or SSO/SAML and on-prem data residency at a published price rather than a custom-scoped one.
The free-forever tier caps storage at 50 GB, and the cap applies to the screenshots, recordings and large attachments your team adds to issues — not to seats or projects.
Bugasura's free-forever plan covers unlimited users, unlimited bug reports, unlimited projects and unlimited Asura runs with no per-seat pricing, which undercuts Jira with Zephyr and per-seat AI testing tools for any team of two or more. Custom pricing is only quoted for on-prem deployment, Testpert AI or enterprise-scale Asura execution, and the vendor lists typical custom deployments as teams of 50+ engineers. Below 50 engineers, the free tier is usually where you stay.
In short
Bagasura — Bugasura is an agentic QA platform that runs context-driven AI testing agents and bug tracking on a free-forever tier for unlimited users. Best for Startups and mid-size engineering teams that want AI-assisted QA without per-seat costs, Teams using Claude or Cursor that want quality context and defect history inside the editor, QA teams piloting AI testing agents before committing automation budget. Free to use.
What's new in Bagasura
Checked 2 days agoAcross the latest 3 updates: 3 changelog entries.
Bugasura release notes — feature and bug tracker improvements
Another release-notes batch covering ongoing feature and improvement work across the bug tracker, browser extension and Android app.
Bug Tracker features and Improvements release
A batch of feature and improvement updates to Bugasura's bug tracker, published to the public release-notes feed.
Extension updates
Updates to the Bugasura browser extension, which powers annotated bug screenshots and screen flows through Chrome Reporter.
What people actually say about Bagasura — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Bagasura on Jul 29, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Bagasura? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- MCP server delivering quality context, test coverage and defect history inside Claude and Cursor
- AI issue tracker with enriched bug capture, triage and deduplication
- Test management to plan, run and track test cycles across sprints
- Requirements management linking requirements to tests with coverage-change tracking
- Knowledge base ingesting requirements, user stories, defect history and product docs
- Browser Asura agent for end-to-end web testing (early access)
- API Asura agent for contract, edge-case and error-state validation with CI escalation
- Duplicate Asura agent for real-time duplicate detection with Slack alerts
- Mobile Asura agent for end-to-end mobile testing (early access)
- Chrome Reporter browser extension for annotated bug screenshots and screen flows
- Web Widget for capturing bugs from live websites
- Voice notes to add context to reported issues
- Android app for bug tracking on the go
- CSV/JSON export and import from Jira, Google Sheets and Excel
- Testpert AI expert Q&A engine with expert-in-the-loop mode (Custom tier)
About Bagasura
Bugasura is an agentic QA platform built for engineering and QA teams who want their AI testing to know the product, not just the DOM. You feed it requirements, user stories, past defects and product docs, and it builds a shared context layer that every test decision runs against — so coverage reflects what matters to your users, not just what's clickable. The platform stacks four layers: context ingestion and knowledge base, an AI issue tracker with enriched bug capture, triage and deduplication, test management that tracks cycle and coverage changes across sprints, and requirements management linking requirements to tests. An MCP server pipes quality context, test coverage signals and defect history into Claude and Cursor, so developers see quality state inside the editor instead of a separate dashboard. Execution runs on specialized agents called Asuras, all in early access: Browser Asura for end-to-end web testing, API Asura for contract, edge-case and error-state validation with automatic escalation into Bugasura issues from CI, Duplicate Asura for real-time duplicate detection with Slack alerts, and Mobile Asura for end-to-end mobile testing. Capture stays low-friction via the Chrome Reporter extension, a Web Widget for live sites, voice notes and an Android app. A Custom tier adds Testpert AI (expert Q&A engine, risk surface mapping, expert-in-the-loop mode), Eagle Eye quality-health visibility for engineering leaders, on-prem deployment, SSO/SAML and private AI processing. Bugasura cites 1,000+ teams, 50,000+ engineers across 25 countries, 25+ integrations including Jira, GitHub, Slack, Linear and Asana, SOC 2 Type II certification and data hosted in India and Singapore. It fits startups and mid-size engineering teams that want AI-assisted QA without per-seat bills, and teams already working inside Claude or Cursor. Against Jira plus Zephyr it starts cheaper but trades away deeply parameterized manual test-case management; against standalone AI test
Behind the Verdict
Most QA tools sell speed. Bugasura sells context. That's a real distinction: feeding requirements, user stories, defect history and product docs into a knowledge base means the agents and the tracker reason against your product rather than a blank framework. If your team's problem is that tests pass while customers still hit bugs, that framing is worth your evaluation time.When to pick it. You're a startup or mid-size team who wants bug tracking, test management and requirements traceability in one place without per-seat bills. Unlimited Asura runs on free is the unusual part; most agentic QA tools meter execution.Where we'd start. Drop the MCP server into Claude or Cursor first. Your developers get quality context, coverage signals and defect history without leaving the editor — that's the lowest-effort route to value, and it costs nothing.What you're buying on Custom. Testpert AI is a separate capability layer: an expert Q&A engine that asks the clarifying questions a senior QA lead would ask before sprint planning, risk surface mapping across requirements and defect history, and an expert-in-the-loop mode where humans approve before anything gets generated downstream. Eagle Eye adds quality-health visibility aimed at engineering leadership rather than daily standups. Add on-prem, SSO/SAML and private AI processing if procurement or data residency demands it.Where it bites. The 50 GB storage cap is the only limit Bugasura advertises on free, and screenshot-heavy or recording-heavy teams will hit it faster than they expect. Testpert AI is not on the free tier, so if the AI-expert reasoning is the reason you're looking, you're on a sales
Researching Bagasura? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Bagasura actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Connect Bugasura's MCP server to the editor, then let developers pull quality context, test coverage signals and defect history while they code, so defect patterns surface before the next commit rather than in a standup.
Outcome: Developers see the state of quality inside the tool they already use, with no per-seat cost and no separate tracker to check.
Ingest user stories and requirements into the knowledge base, plan and run test cycles in test management, capture bugs through the Chrome Reporter extension with annotated screenshots and screen flows, and let Duplicate Asura flag repeat reports before they hit the backlog.
Outcome: Coverage changes stay traced to requirements, and duplicate noise stops consuming triage time from the first sprint.
Wire API Asura into CI so it validates contracts, edge cases and error states on each run, and escalates any failure automatically into a Bugasura issue rather than a raw pipeline log.
Outcome: Failures land as tracked, assignable issues with full context attached, instead of being triaged by hand from build output.
Use Cases
- Generate tests from requirements and user stories so you stop writing test cases by hand.
- Detect duplicate bug reports in real time with Duplicate Asura before they clutter your backlog.
- Surface test coverage, quality context and defect history inside Claude or Cursor via the MCP server while developers code.
- Give engineering leaders a risk-surface view of quality health instead of dashboards full of raw test counts.
- Run end-to-end browser tests with Browser Asura that reason about business context, not just DOM elements.
- Onboard new QA engineers faster by pointing them at a knowledge base that already holds product docs and past defect patterns.
- Validate API contracts and edge cases in CI with API Asura, which escalates failures automatically into Bugasura issues.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-17
Limitations
- The free-forever tier caps storage at 50 GB, which bites if your team attaches lots of screenshots, recordings or large files to issues.
- The advanced intelligence layer — Testpert AI, advanced Q&A engine, expert-in-the-loop mode, risk surface mapping, Eagle Eye quality-health visibility, knowledge base AI chat, context mapping and deeper test heuristics — is only available under custom pricing.
- On-premises deployment, SSO/SAML, data isolation (India and Singapore hosting), private AI mode and a dedicated success manager are likewise custom-only.
- The Asura agents — Browser, API, Duplicate and Mobile — are labelled early access by the vendor.
- The product is primarily web-based, with a Chrome extension, a web widget and an Android app for capture and tracking.
- The vendor also flags that marketplace Asuras from third-party creators may carry their own pricing when they launch, so the "free forever" claim applies to the platform and built-in Asuras you use today, not to agents someone else publishes later.
as of 2026-10-09
Verification history
We have re-verified Bagasura 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Bagasura tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free — Forever
$0
Ideal for
Startups and mid-size engineering teams under roughly 50 engineers that want the full platform — AI issue tracker, test and requirements management, knowledge base, MCP server, built-in Asuras — without per-seat bills.
What this tier adds
Starting tier: $0 with unlimited users, unlimited bug reports, unlimited projects and unlimited Asura runs; the only ceiling is 50 GB of storage.
Custom — Enterprise & Scale
Custom
Ideal for
Teams of 50+ engineers running Bugasura at scale or on-prem, regulated organisations needing data-residency guarantees, and teams that want Testpert's advanced AI for QA.
What this tier adds
Adds the Testpert AI layer (expert Q&A engine, expert-in-the-loop mode, risk surface mapping), Eagle Eye quality-health visibility, knowledge base AI chat, automated context mapping, deeper test heuristics, on-prem deployment, SSO/SAML, data isolation with India and Singapore
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Bagasura's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Bugasura's free-forever plan covers unlimited users, unlimited bug reports, unlimited projects and unlimited Asura runs with no per-seat pricing, which undercuts Jira with Zephyr and per-seat AI testing tools for any team of two or more. Custom pricing is only quoted for on-prem deployment, Testpert AI or enterprise-scale Asura execution, and the vendor lists typical custom deployments as teams of 50+ engineers. Below 50 engineers, the free tier is usually where you stay.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Bagasura — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For a developer connecting the MCP server into Claude or Cursor: minutes, and it sits on the free tier. For a QA lead standing up the AI issue tracker plus test management and requirements: roughly an afternoon, most of it spent importing existing issues by CSV/JSON or from Jira, Google Sheets and Excel. For an engineering leader wiring API Asura into CI: plan a few days to settle which failures
Switching to or from Bagasura
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Jira: import issues by CSV/JSON export, then map requirement-to-test links in Bugasura's requirements management.
- →From a spreadsheet tracker: import issues directly from Google Sheets or Excel by CSV/JSON.
- →From GitHub Issues: export the issue list, import by CSV/JSON, and keep GitHub as the code-side integration.
- →From a manual QA process: load existing requirements, user stories, defect history and product docs into the knowledge base first, so test generation runs against real context.
- ↗To Jira with Zephyr: export Bugasura issues by CSV/JSON, then rebuild test cycles in Zephyr if you need deeply parameterized manual test-case management.
- ↗To GitHub Issues: export by CSV/JSON for a lightweight tracker, accepting the loss of requirement-to-test coverage tracking.
- ↗To an all-in-one ALM suite: export by CSV/JSON and expect to re-map requirements, cycles and coverage manually, since those structures do not transfer as-is.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Bagasura”, and we withheld 5: 5 could not be judged, because “Bagasura” is a single word that other videos use for other things. Showing the 1 we can prove is about Bagasura.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Bagasura
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Bagasura, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
TestDriver AI
TestDriver runs AI UI testing on every GitHub pull request — black-box E2E tests that self-heal.
Million
Million builds React Bench evals for frontier coding agents, plus open-source React Doctor and React Scan for React performance debugging.
Chrome DevTools MCP
Open-source MCP server that gives coding agents live Chrome DevTools for debugging, traces, and browser automation.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Bagasura vs Locus Robotics
Locus Robotics and Bagasura serve fundamentally different needs: Locus automates physical warehouse operations for high-volume fulfillment, while Bagasura automates software quality assurance for AI-era development teams. Buyers should choose based on whether their challenge is physical order picking or digital product testing. Bagasura's free tier makes it risk-free for software teams, whereas Locus requires a RaaS commitment but delivers proven 2-3x productivity gains in warehouses.
Bagasura vs Presto Voice
Presto Voice and Bagasura serve completely different domains: Presto automates drive-thru ordering for QSR chains, Bagasura is a QA platform for software teams. Choose Presto if you operate multiple drive-thru locations and want proven upsell revenue lifts. Choose Bagasura if you need a free, AI-enhanced test management tool that integrates with your dev stack.
Bagasura vs Truleo
If you’re a law enforcement agency drowning in siloed data from RMS, jail calls, and body cameras, Truleo is purpose-built to generate leads and cut report writing time by 80%. But if you’re a software team shipping at AI speed, Bagasura offers a generous free tier with AI-powered testing, context-driven bug tracking, and integrations that make it a cost-effective alternative to expensive QA suites.
Alternatives to Bagasura
View all
TestDriver AI
TestDriver runs AI UI testing on every GitHub pull request — black-box E2E tests that self-heal.
Million
Million builds React Bench evals for frontier coding agents, plus open-source React Doctor and React Scan for React performance debugging.
Chrome DevTools MCP
Open-source MCP server that gives coding agents live Chrome DevTools for debugging, traces, and browser automation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Used Bagasura? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.