Context.dev
One API for web scraping, enrichment, and brand data extraction
Context.dev is a smart pick for teams that want scraping and brand enrichment from a single API, especially AI agents needing live web context. The free tier lets you test without risk, and pre-built extractors save hours. But pricing climbs fast, so if you're scraping at massive scale, crunch the numbers against Apify before committing.
Verified 7d ago · liveness 76/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/context-dev
- Developers building AI agents that need live web context
- Product teams automating onboarding with brand data enrichment
- Data engineers building scalable scraped data pipelines
- Teams replacing multiple vendors (scraper + brand API) with one platform
- Non-technical users wanting a GUI-only point-and-click scraper
- Projects needing real-time streaming (batch only)
- High-volume scraping at lowest cost per page (Apify may be cheaper)
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Context.dev if you need real-time streaming, pure on-premises deployment, or the absolute lowest cost per page at very high volumes where Apify's marketplace may be cheaper.
Going from Free to Growth jumps to $59/mo, which may be steep if you only need occasional scraping.
Context.dev's pricing fits small-to-mid teams that need unified scraping + enrichment without managing infrastructure. Free tier (500 credits) is generous for trials, but production use quickly moves to Growth ($59/mo). Compared to Apify, which can be cheaper at massive scale, Context.dev wins on integration speed and unified endpoints — but if you're scraping at enormous volume, Apify's per-page pricing may be more cost-effective.
In short
Context.dev — One API for web scraping, enrichment, and brand data extraction. Best for Developers building AI agents that need live web context, Product teams automating onboarding with brand data enrichment, Data engineers building scalable scraped data pipelines. Free to start; paid plans from $59/mo.
What people actually say about Context.dev — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
35 mentions across 4 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Lemmy) · researched Aug 7, 2026.
- +One clean API replaces scraper, proxy, and retry stitching.
- +50+ pre-built extractors for LinkedIn, Maps, Zendesk and more.
- +Low-code visual builder for custom targets without heavy code.
- +Clean markdown output simplifies LLM ingestion and agent use.
- +Useful brand data: logos, colors, fonts, socials, NAICS codes.
- −Limited independent user reviews beyond launch window.
- −No public status page or incident history data.
- −Real-world reliability and anti-bot success unproven.
- −Data structuring and post-extraction use not fully addressed.
- −Name confusion and search ambiguity with other 'Context' products.
- • Overages on credits can add up quickly if you exceed monthly limits
- • The under-5-second SLA is only on higher-paid plans, not the free or basic tiers
- • No transparent overage pricing published in the data
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Context.dev? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: August 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Scrape any URL to clean markdown
- Crawl entire websites via sitemap
- Extract structured data with JSON schema
- Retrieve brand data (logos, colors, fonts, socials)
- Pull images and screenshots from any URL
- Classify companies by NAICS/SIC codes
- Identify transaction strings to brands
- Automatic proxy rotation and anti-bot bypass
- Headless browser rendering for JS-heavy sites
- Webhook delivery and schedule triggers
- Response-time SLA under 5 seconds (Growth+ plans)
- Low-code visual builder for custom scrapers
- Pre-built extractors for 50+ sites
- Logo CDN with <img> tag (no API call)
- Integrations with Zapier, Bubble, Retool, Make, n8n
About Context.dev
Context.dev is a unified API platform that turns messy website data into clean, structured output. Instead of managing proxies, headless browsers, and anti-bot workarounds, developers get one endpoint for scraping, enrichment, and brand data extraction. You can scrape any URL to clean markdown, crawl entire sites via sitemap, or pull structured data with a JSON schema. Pre-built extractors cover LinkedIn, Google Maps, and 50+ other sites, and a low-code builder lets you create custom targets without heavy setup. Outputs come as JSON or CSV, delivered via webhook, schedule triggers, or automatic retry. The platform stands out for its built-in enrichment capabilities. You can retrieve brand data (logos, colors, fonts, socials), pull images and screenshots, classify companies by NAICS/SIC codes, and even identify transaction strings to brands. A logo CDN serves logos with a simple <img> tag, so you don't even need an API call for that. Automatic proxy rotation and headless browser rendering handle JavaScript-heavy sites, and intelligent error handling reduces failed scrapes. On Growth+ plans, you get a response-time SLA under 5 seconds, making it viable for real-time-ish workflows like AI agents needing live web context. Context.dev integrates as a no-code plugin for Zapier, Bubble, Retool, Make, n8n, Google Sheets, Airtable, Supabase, and Pipedream. That makes it accessible beyond just developers: product teams can enrich onboarding data, data engineers can build scalable pipelines, and analysts can monitor competitor changes. It's a YC-backed (YC S26) launch, which adds credibility for teams evaluating long-term infrastructure. Compared to point solutions, Context.dev replaces multiple vendors (scraper + brand API + enrichment) with one platform. If you're weighing pure cost-per-page, Apify-style marketplaces may be cheaper at huge volumes, but Context.dev wins on integration speed and unified endpoints. The free tier (500 credits, no credit card) gives you a risk-free way to test the API.
Behind the Verdict
Context.dev positions itself as a unified API that collapses the typical scraping stack—proxies, headless browsers, anti-bot evasion—into a single endpoint. For developers building AI agents that need live web context, the promise is compelling: you send a URL, get clean markdown or structured JSON, and move on. The platform's enrichment layer is a differentiator: pulling brand logos, colors, fonts, and social links, plus NAICS/SIC classification, means you can skip multiple point solutions. The logo CDN is a nice touch—serving a logo via <img> tag without an API call is genuinely useful for product teams. The free tier (500 credits, no credit card) lowers the barrier to trial, and the pre-built extractors for 50+ sites (LinkedIn, Google Maps, etc.) save hours of custom configuration. The low-code builder extends accessibility to non-developers, though it's still a builder, not a GUI-only tool. Integrations with Zapier, Bubble, Retool, Make, n8n, Google Sheets, Airtable, Supabase, and Pipedream make it viable for no-code automation. Weaknesses: the free tier is limited to 1 concurrent request, which will feel restrictive for any serious testing. Larger plans cap concurrency (20 on Pro), and the response-time SLA only applies to Growth+ plans ($59/mo). At scale, Apify's marketplace may undercut on cost per page. Context.dev is batch-oriented, not real-time streaming—so if you need live streaming, this isn't the fit. On-premises-only deployments aren't supported; you're dependent on their cloud. Overall, Context.dev is a strong fit for teams that value integration speed and unified endpoints over raw cost-per-page. YC S26 backing adds credibility. If you're a solo developer on a tight budget, the free tier might be enough for small experiments, but for production you'll likely need at least Growth.
Researching Context.dev? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Context.dev actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Building an agent that needs live website context to answer user questions.
Outcome: You use Context.dev's scrape-to-markdown endpoint to pull fresh content on demand, with the under-5-second SLA on Growth+ ensuring your agent responds quickly.
Onboarding new customers and wanting to enrich their company profiles automatically.
Outcome: You set up a Zapier integration to trigger Context.dev's brand data extraction when a new lead signs up, pulling logo, colors, and social links into your CRM without manual work.
Tracking pricing and product changes on competitor websites.
Outcome: You create a scheduled scrape that checks product pages daily, using JSON schema extraction to log price changes into Google Sheets for trend analysis.
Use Cases
- Extract product listings from e-commerce sites for price monitoring
- Enrich lead lists with LinkedIn profiles and company info
- Scrape job postings from multiple boards into a structured database
- Pull real estate listings with details and images for market analysis
- Automate competitor review collection from Google Maps and Yelp
- Transform messy HTML tables into clean CSV files for reporting
Limitations
- Free tier limited to 500 credits and 1 concurrent request.
- Larger plans cap concurrent requests (e.g., 20 on Pro).
- Response SLA applies only to Growth+ plans.
- Some advanced enrichment features require Pro or Scale.
as of 2026-08-15
Verification history
We have re-verified Context.dev 5 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Context.dev tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Developers or hobbyists exploring the API with 500 credits and no credit card required, ideal for testing basic scrapes and enrichment.
What this tier adds
Starting tier with 500 credits and 1 concurrent request; access to core API features but no SLA.
Growth
$59/mo
Ideal for
Small teams with production needs, requiring a response-time SLA under 5 seconds and higher rate limits for AI agent or real-time use cases.
What this tier adds
Adds response-time SLA under 5 seconds, higher rate limits, and access to pre-built extractors and low-code builder.
Pro
$199/mo
Ideal for
Growing companies with higher volume needs and a requirement for priority support, suitable for scaling data pipelines.
What this tier adds
Higher volume credits, priority support, and advanced features like higher concurrency and advanced enrichment.
Scale
$399/mo
Ideal for
Large teams or enterprises with demanding scraping workloads that need SLA guarantees and dedicated support options.
What this tier adds
Even higher volume, SLA guarantees, and dedicated support options.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Organizations with custom requirements for limits, SLAs, and integrations, needing tailored support.
What this tier adds
Custom limits, custom SLAs, dedicated support, and custom integrations.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Context.dev's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Context.dev's pricing fits small-to-mid teams that need unified scraping + enrichment without managing infrastructure. Free tier (500 credits) is generous for trials, but production use quickly moves to Growth ($59/mo). Compared to Apify, which can be cheaper at massive scale, Context.dev wins on integration speed and unified endpoints — but if you're scraping at enormous volume, Apify's per-page pricing may be more cost-effective.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Context.dev — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Most developers can get a basic scrape working in under 10 minutes with the API's simple endpoint and free tier. Non-developers using the low-code builder or no-code integrations (Zapier, Retool) may take 30-60 minutes to configure their first workflow, depending on complexity.
Switching to or from Context.dev
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Apify: Replace multiple actors with Context.dev's unified API; use pre-built extractors for common sites and the low-code builder for custom targets. The free tier lets you test before migrating.
- →From ScrapingBee: Use Context.dev's JSON schema extraction and brand enrichment to consolidate scraping and enrichment into one platform, simplifying your stack.
- ↗To Apify: If Apify's marketplace offers lower cost per page at your scale, you can migrate by replicating your extraction logic as Apify actors, though you'll lose the built-in brand enrichment.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with Context.dev
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Context.dev, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Context Dev vs Geologicai
GeologicAI and Context.dev serve entirely different domains. GeologicAI is purpose-built for critical minerals mining with multi-sensor core scanning and AI logging, now enhanced via the Lumo Analytics acquisition to detect rare-earth elements. Context.dev is a general-purpose web scraping API for developers. Choose GeologicAI for mining workflows; choose Context.dev for web data extraction. There is no direct competition.
Context Dev vs Versatile
These tools are incomparable as they serve entirely different domains. Versatile is a niche hardware+software solution for steel erection crane ops, while Context.dev is a general-purpose web scraping API. Choose based on whether your core need is construction site intelligence (Versatile) or automated data extraction from websites (Context.dev).
Context Dev vs Screenplayiq
These tools serve completely different needs. Choose ScreenplayIQ if you're a screenwriter or studio executive needing AI-driven script analysis with box office forecasts; its free tier offers a taste, while paid plans unlock detailed market comparisons. Choose Context.dev if you're a developer or data scientist needing a reliable API for web scraping and data enrichment from 50+ sites, with low-code options for automation. There is no overlap in use cases.
Alternatives to Context.dev
View allFrequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Used Context.dev? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.