MYPEAS.ai

TrackImpact's pitch is unusually specific: it is not a productivity suite, it is an evidence file for the moment someone asks what you actually did with AI. The loop is deliberately manual. You enter the tool, the task, weekly hours saved, a 1–5 quality rating, and whether the workflow is adopted or still a pilot; then you attach evidence links and files. That friction is also the product's honesty — a number you typed and can defend in a room beats a silently scraped activity log your manager can't interpret. Strengths. The personal dashboard answers the three questions a review conversation actually contains: how many implementations, how many hours saved per week, and how good the output was (the example dashboard shows 12 items, 8.5h saved/week, 9 adopted, 4.2 average quality, 7 evidence items). Pro at £9/month adds the artefacts that make it presentable — PDF reports with charts, an AI-generated executive summary, KPI linking, unlimited attachments. For managers, the team seat at £15/seat/month or £11/seat/month billed annually gives an admin an aggregated view: total hours saved, an annualised value figure, a member leaderboard, department breakdowns, tool adoption across ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor and GitHub Copilot, CSV export and a team PDF with risk areas and recommendations. The anonymise switch matters if you're collecting this from people who don't want a leaderboard tied to their name. Weaknesses. Everything depends on your own discipline — the tool does not watch your apps, so a quiet month produces a quiet report. The free tier caps you at 5 implementations, which is enough to test the idea and not enough to build a year's case. Team analytics are admin-only by design; if you want members comparing notes with each other, that's not what this does, and there's no on-premises deployment for companies that can't put employee data in a SaaS tool. The AI Profiles are a different product wearing the same logo: a one-time £99 Marketplace profile (from $129) gives a pre-built roadmap for a job title crosswalked across O*NET, ISCO, ESCO and ANZSCO with HITL scores and matched tools; £112+ buys a Custom profile built from your actual job description with ROI projections. Useful for job seekers and for planning what to automate next — but a profile is a plan, not a record, and the tracking dashboard is what carries the evidence. Where it fits. Employees at companies that have publicly tied reviews to AI adoption, job seekers who need documented AI experience, contractors proving gains to clients, and managers who need a defensible adoption number without installing monitoring software. Where it doesn't: freelancers who never need formal evidence, teams that want automatic capture, and anyone unwilling to spend a few minutes a week writing entries.