
Asynchronous video feedback & AI to-do lists for Figma design reviews.
By Tanmay Verma, Founder · Last verified 03 Jul 2026
In short
Opine — Asynchronous video feedback & AI to-do lists for Figma design reviews. Best for UX designers seeking async feedback workflows, Remote design teams tired of synchronous reviews, Agencies managing client design approvals. Free to start; paid plans from $16123/mo.
See what real users actually say. We scan live discussions, reviews and complaints across the web and hand you an honest verdict — in under a minute.
3 free scans · no card needed · downloadable report
A focused, practical solution for teams overwhelmed by meeting-heavy design feedback. The AI summarization genuinely saves time, but its Figma-only dependency limits reach. Best for async-first design teams already committed to video communication.
Compare with: Opine vs Figr, Opine vs CoLab, Opine vs Subframe
Last verified: July 2026
Across the latest 9 updates: 5 feature updates, 2 launches and 2 news mentions.
Figma shares leadership insights from Config 2026 on guiding teams through change and keeping quality high.
Figma agent skills now allow sharing best thinking and learning from team prompts for better collaboration.
Figma profiles eight artists behind Season 5 merch, discussing their workflow and inspiration.
New integration allows Weave creative workflows to live alongside Figma frames.
Code layers in Figma Design allow exploring multiple code directions side by side with designs.
Figma agent gains custom tools, real context, and skills for more controlled design generation.
Figma Motion brings timeline-based animation to the canvas, enabling precise, reusable, dev-ready animations.
Dylan Field announces code layers, Figma Motion, shaders, generative plugins and Weave tools at Config 2026.
Figma announced new materials: Motion, 3D transforms, Shaders, Code layers, agent skills, generative plugins, and Weave tools.
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
38 mentions across 3 sources (Hacker News, App Store, Lemmy).
How likely is Opine to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 4 signals — momentum (how recently it shipped), wrapper dependency, revenue model, and web presence.
Last calculated: July 2026
How we score →Opine is a Figma plugin that replaces synchronous design review meetings with async video feedback and AI-powered task management. Designers record walkthroughs of their work, stakeholders reply with time-stamped video comments, and Opine's AI automatically synthesizes the feedback into a prioritized to-do list. Built specifically for Figma, it integrates directly into the design workflow, making it a lightweight addition for remote or distributed teams. Targeted at UX designers, product managers, and agencies, Opine reduces meeting fatigue while preserving the nuance of verbal feedback. Its ChatGPT integration converts discussion into actionable tasks, and users can mark items as done or add notes—all without leaving Figma. Key features include video-recorded design walkthroughs, time-stamped video responses, AI-generated action items, and comment threads per video. Sharing is easy via link, and stakeholders don't need a Figma account to participate. Compared to annotation tools like Zeplin or Red Pen, Opine captures full conversation flow with video, preserving tone and context. However, it is limited to Figma and doesn't support real-time co-editing or whiteboarding.
Opine tackles a real pain point: design feedback that spirals into endless meetings or cryptic comment threads. By pairing async video with AI-generated to-do lists, it cuts meeting time while keeping context intact. The video-first approach is a standout—stakeholders can convey tone and nuance that text comments miss. Where to use it: remote design teams, agencies with multiple client reviews, or product managers juggling handoffs. The plugin is lightweight, and stakeholders don't need Figma seats to reply. Where it falls short: Figma-only integration locks out non-Figma users. You can't use it with Sketch, Adobe XD, or web-based prototypes. Also, AI summarization quality depends on ChatGPT; ambiguous feedback may still require manual triage. Compared to Marker or UseBerry, Opine is simpler—it doesn't offer whiteboarding or real-time collaboration. But that's also its strength: focused, not bloated. In practice, Opine works well for teams already using async communication. If your culture expects live feedback or you need advanced prototyping tools, look elsewhere. Pricing is reasonable for small teams, but full-seat costs can add up for larger orgs.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Opine, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Used Opine? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.