Sim
Open-source AI agent workspace to build, deploy and govern multi-agent workflows with 270+ integrations.
Pick Sim when agent workflows need an audit trail and a budget line, not just a chain of steps. Per-run cost tracing, permission groups scoping models and tools, spend caps per member and Docker/Kubernetes self-hosting are what separate it from n8n and Zapier. Skip it if you want a zero-setup chatbot or can't spare anyone to configure and maintain workflows.
Verified 51m ago · liveness 78/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/sim
- Ops and platform teams needing cost and access controls over production agent workflows
- Developers who want an open-source agent framework self-hostable on Docker or Kubernetes
- Enterprises requiring SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, audit records, SSO and SCIM
- Teams automating cross-tool processes across Slack, Notion, Salesforce and Jira
- Anyone wanting a consumer chatbot with zero setup
- Teams without the technical capacity to configure and maintain workflows
- Latency-sensitive workloads: sync timeout starts at 5 minutes on Free
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Sim if you need a fully managed, no-code-only automation tool with instant request handling, since Free's 1,000 one-time credits and Pro's 50-minute sync timeout cap long-running jobs.
Credits are metered, not unlimited: Free gives 1,000 one-time credits and Pro adds 6,000/month plus a 2,000/week refresh, so heavy agent traffic pushes you toward Max or a custom Enterprise credit pool.
Free ($0) fits solo experimentation; Pro at $25 per user/month billed monthly (15% off annually) is the realistic starting point for a small team; Max at $100 per user/month billed monthly suits scaling teams that need Sim Mailer, KB Live Sync, Sandboxes and Slack Connect. Against Zapier and Make, Sim costs more per seat but includes self-hosting, audit records and spend controls that those tools charge enterprise rates for; against n8n, Sim's seat pricing replaces a cheaper self-managed
In short
Sim — Open-source AI agent workspace to build, deploy and govern multi-agent workflows with 270+ integrations. Best for Ops and platform teams needing cost and access controls over production agent workflows, Developers who want an open-source agent framework self-hostable on Docker or Kubernetes, Enterprises requiring SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, audit records, SSO and SCIM. Free to start; paid plans from $25/user/mo.
What's new in Sim
Checked 5 days agoAcross the latest 5 updates: 5 changelog entries.
v0.9.12 — fork source-deployment comparison, You.com integration, Power BI actions
Adds comparison of last synced source deployments for forks, a You.com integration, Power BI actions and Lucid/Notion browsing, plus TypeScript SDK v0.2.1 and Python SDK v0.2.1 on npm and PyPI.
v0.9.10 — deployment version comparison and live dashboard panels
Lets you compare workflow deployment versions across the UI and API, embeds live dashboard panels in markdown, renders file diff fences and themed mermaid diagrams, and cycles composer modes with Shift+Tab.
v0.9.1 — browser agent tab fixes and ARM64 image build
Fixes background agent browser tabs, actionable refusals and timed pointer paths, and builds the ARM64 app image on a 16 vCPU runner.
v0.8.59 — OAuth for workflow MCP servers
Adds OAuth support on workflow MCP servers and clarifies knowledge connector authentication in the Copilot.
v0.8.56 — GPT-6 Sol and Luna plus Claude Opus 5.5 models
Adds GPT-6 Sol and Luna and Claude Opus 5.5 providers, TypeSafe evaluation models in Agent, and consolidates access requests in settings.
What people actually say about Sim — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
106 mentions across 6 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, App Store, Stack Overflow, GitHub, Lemmy) · researched Sep 1, 2026.
Average across the 6 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +Open-source and self-hostable, avoiding vendor lock-in.
- +1,000+ integrations and major LLM support (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.).
- +Visual workflow builder plus code and plain-English agent creation.
- +SOC2 compliance signals enterprise-ready security posture.
- +Built-in observability with per-run traces, logs, and cost tracking.
- −Community feedback is scarce; limited proof of production reliability.
- −Credits system may feel limiting for heavy usage on free tier.
- −Intermediate skill level required—may overwhelm non-technical users.
- −Self-hosting adds operational complexity; needs maintenance.
- −Support quality unverified due to minimal public testimonials.
- • Self-hosting may incur infrastructure and maintenance costs not included in SaaS pricing
- • Credit consumption for complex workflows may scale faster than expected
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Sim? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Visual workflow canvas for building agent logic block by block
- Chat builder that assembles agents from a plain-English description
- CLI and Claude Code integration to build, run and manage agents
- Knowledge Base auto-syncing Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, Slack, GitHub and SharePoint
- Tables that store structured rows agents read and update between runs
- Shared Files store for uploads, reports and agent outputs
- Block-by-block run logs with success rate, median runtime and per-run cost
- Permission groups scoping models, integrations and tools per team
- Organization and per-member spend controls with cost tracked by workspace
- SSO and SCIM identity provisioning
- Audit records for security-relevant changes
- Self-hosting on Docker or Kubernetes in your own cloud
- MCP server and tool deployment with OAuth support on workflow MCP servers
- REST API with TypeScript SDK v0.2.1 and Python SDK v0.2.1
- GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol and Luna, plus Claude Opus 5.5 model support
About Sim
Sim is an open-source AI workspace for building and governing AI agents across a team. You can create agents three ways: a visual canvas of blocks, a conversational Chat builder that assembles the agent from a plain description, or code through the CLI and Claude Code. All of it lands in one workspace instead of a pile of separate tools. Agents pull memory from a synced Knowledge Base that auto-syncs Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, Slack, GitHub and SharePoint. Tables hold structured rows agents read and update between runs, and Files keep shared uploads, reports and agent outputs in one store. Logs trace every run block by block, so a support-ticket routing run at 1.86s sits next to its input, output, cost and failure point. Governance is the differentiator. Permission groups control which models, integrations and tools each team can use, spend limits apply at organization and per-member level, SSO and SCIM handle identity and provisioning, audit records capture security-relevant changes, and self-hosting runs in your own cloud via Docker or Kubernetes. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and GDPR are documented in the Trust Center. Model coverage spans OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, xAI and Cerebras, with GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Luna and Claude Opus 5.5 added in the September 2026 releases. Think of Sim against n8n, Zapier, Make, Gumloop, Workato and Tines as automation plus a permission and cost layer. Ops and platform teams who have to answer "who spent what, and which agent did that?" get value fastest.
Behind the Verdict
The question Sim answers is one most agent builders ignore until it hurts: which agent touched this, who approved it, and what did it cost? Block-level traces with per-run dollar amounts, permission groups that gate models and integrations per team, and spend limits at both org and member level make that answerable. If you're moving agents from demo to production with a budget owner watching, that framing is worth paying for. When to pick it: you have several teams building agents and need one place to see them all. The canvas, Chat builder and CLI all land in the same logs, so a non-engineer's workflow and a developer's CLI run are comparable side by side. The knowledge connectors are the other draw (Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, Slack, GitHub, SharePoint) because grounding agents in real company docs is most of the work anyway. When to pass. If your problem is a single automation between two SaaS apps, Zapier or Make gets you there faster and cheaper. Solo builders will likely bounce off the $25 per user/month Pro floor, and Free's 1,000 one-time credits with a 5-minute sync timeout won't survive real production traffic. There's genuine configuration work here: connectors to authenticate, permission groups to model, spend caps to set. In practice, the governance features are the product. SSO and SCIM mean IT can provision without tickets. Audit records give security a paper trail. Self-hosting on your own cloud is the lever for regulated teams that can't send data to a vendor. Data retention is configurable per workspace, which matters for compliance reviews. The closest comparison is n8n: both open-source, both self-hostable, both integration-heavy. n8n has the deeper automation library and larger community. Sim leans harder on the agent-specific stack
Researching Sim? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Sim actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Describe a support agent in plain English that reads the synced Notion and Confluence knowledge bases, drafts a reply to each inbound Gmail ticket, and posts to a Slack channel when it cannot answer with confidence.
Outcome: Runs appear in Logs with success rate and per-run cost, spend controls cap the monthly model bill per member, and escalations route to Slack instead of getting stuck in a draft.
Build the same enrichment workflow on the visual canvas, then move it into code and run it from the terminal with 'sim workflows run' in CI, comparing deployment versions before promoting to production.
Outcome: One trace covers both the canvas and CLI versions, so deployment version comparison across UI and API catches regressions before rollout.
Enable SSO and SCIM, create permission groups that restrict the finance team to approved models and integrations, set per-member spend limits, and deploy Sim into the company's own Kubernetes cluster.
Outcome: Audit records capture every security-relevant change, each workspace sets its own data retention, and the Trust Center's SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 coverage satisfies procurement.
Use Cases
- Automate email triage and response using Gmail and Slack integrations.
- Enrich leads by combining Apollo, Clearbit and Salesforce in one agent.
- Orchestrate multi-step code review workflows triggered by GitHub PRs.
- Monitor Datadog infrastructure alerts and create Jira tickets automatically.
- Synchronize data between Notion databases and a Postgres warehouse on a schedule.
- Build a support agent that queries a knowledge base and escalates via Slack.
- Automate Shopify order management with the pinned API version.
- Run Power BI actions and browse Lucid or Notion content from an agent.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-17
Limitations
- Free caps you at 1,000 one-time credits with a weekly refresh, 1 workspace, 10 concurrent executions, 5 GB file storage, 5 tables of 50,000 rows and 30-day log retention — experimentation only.
- Throughput scales by tier: sync executions run 50/min on Free, 150/min on Pro, and sync timeout rises from 5 minutes on Free to 50 minutes on Pro.
- Self-hosting, SSO, SOC 2 compliance and dedicated support are not included below Enterprise.
- The platform is a web workspace plus API, SDKs and CLI; no mobile or desktop app is described in the scraped content.
as of 2026-10-03
Verification history
We have re-verified Sim 11 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 11 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Sim tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
A solo builder or developer evaluating Sim on one throwaway workflow, not a team running agents in production.
What this tier adds
Starting tier: 1,000 one-time credits with weekly refresh, 1 workspace, 10 concurrent executions, 5 GB storage, 5 tables at 50,000 rows and 30-day log retention.
Pro
$25/user/mo billed monthly
Ideal for
A small ops or platform team of two to ten people automating recurring cross-tool work like lead enrichment, ticket triage or scheduled syncs.
What this tier adds
Adds 6,000 credits/month plus a 2,000/week refresh, 3 workspaces with teammate invites, 50 concurrent executions, 50 GB storage, 100 tables and unlimited log retention.
Max
$100/user/mo billed monthly
Ideal for
A scaling business with multiple teams and shared agent infrastructure that needs mailbox, live knowledge sync and sandboxed testing.
What this tier adds
Adds Sim Mailer, KB Live Sync, Sandboxes, Slack Connect and Access Control on top of Pro, plus unlimited workspaces, 200 concurrent executions, 25,000 credits/month and 500 GB storage.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Regulated enterprises and platform owners that must self-host and answer procurement questions about identity, audit and data residency.
What this tier adds
Adds SSO, SCIM, self-hosting, audit records and data retention controls, with customizable credits and up to 1,000 concurrent executions, plus SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and GDPR coverage and dedicated support.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Sim's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Free ($0) fits solo experimentation; Pro at $25 per user/month billed monthly (15% off annually) is the realistic starting point for a small team; Max at $100 per user/month billed monthly suits scaling teams that need Sim Mailer, KB Live Sync, Sandboxes and Slack Connect. Against Zapier and Make, Sim costs more per seat but includes self-hosting, audit records and spend controls that those tools charge enterprise rates for; against n8n, Sim's seat pricing replaces a cheaper self-managed
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Sim — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Solo builder: first agent running in under an hour, since describe-to-build needs no block wiring, though accounts exceeding Free's 1,000 one-time credits upgrade to Pro at $25 per user/month billed monthly quickly. Small team: half a day to connect Slack and Notion, invite teammates and set spend limits. Enterprise: one to two weeks, dominated by SSO/SCIM provisioning, permission-group design
Switching to or from Sim
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Zapier: rebuild each Zap as a Sim workflow with equivalent blocks, then keep Zapier running in parallel until Logs show matching success rates.
- →From Make: map scenarios to Sim workflows, replacing Make's modules with Sim blocks and its data stores with Tables.
- →From n8n: import the flow logic into Sim's canvas and repoint credentials, then move scheduled jobs to Sim's schedule and webhook triggers.
- →From a hand-rolled script: wrap it in a Sim workflow block, or drive it from the CLI with 'sim workflows run' and keep the existing code.
- →From Retool or Pipedream: keep the UI or endpoint layer and move the agent logic into Sim so runs land in one Logs view with cost per run.
- ↗To n8n: export workflow logic block by block, since n8n's node model maps closely to Sim's canvas.
- ↗To Zapier: rebuild simple linear workflows as Zaps; accept losing block-level cost tracing and self-hosting.
- ↗To Make: convert trigger-and-action chains to scenarios, accepting a closed-source runtime.
- ↗To a code-only stack: keep the agent prompts and replace the canvas with your own orchestration, losing the built-in Logs and governance layer.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Sim”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Sim” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Sim.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Sim
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Sim, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
AutoGen Studio
Free, open-source web UI for prototyping multi-agent AI workflows on AutoGen AgentChat — build agent teams without writing code.
Stack AI
StackAI is an enterprise AI agent factory for building, deploying, and governing agentic workflows.
DataRobot
Enterprise agent workforce platform for building, operating, and governing AI agents across on-prem, hybrid, and multi-cloud environments.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Sim vs Spider Cloud
Choose Sim if your priority is building and orchestrating custom AI agents across many internal tools and LLMs, especially if you need visual workflow design and self-hosting. Choose Spider Cloud if your primary need is fast, reliable, and cost-effective web crawling and scraping to feed external data into AI agents or RAG pipelines. They solve different problems: internal process automation vs. external data acquisition.
Sim vs Presto Voice
If you're building internal automation across many tools, Sim's open-source agent platform with 1000+ integrations and freemium pricing is the clear choice. If you run a QSR drive-thru chain, Presto Voice is purpose-built for that single use case with proven ROI metrics. For most buyers, Sim offers far more flexibility and value.
Sim vs Temporal Ai
Choose Sim if you want a turnkey AI agent builder with 1,000+ integrations and a visual workflow editor — ideal for rapid automation without heavy coding. Choose Temporal AI if you need rock-solid durability, automatic retries, and SDK-driven orchestration for mission-critical, long-running workflows — even though it demands more upfront investment in workflow-as-code thinking.
Alternatives to Sim
View all
AutoGen Studio
Free, open-source web UI for prototyping multi-agent AI workflows on AutoGen AgentChat — build agent teams without writing code.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Sim? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.