Zero: the address we list now redirects elsewhere · last checked 14 Nov 2026
Zero
Okou is the AI teammate that plans and executes multi-step jobs across 4,000+ connectors and turns completed runs into reusable team
Okou earns a shortlist slot when the blocker is a security review, not capability — microVM isolation, network-layer secrets and a per-run audit trail do real work there. Reusable workflows that teammates re-run with their own permissions are the other reason to pick it over Manus or Claude Code. Budget for credit packages though; the plan fee is only the floor.
Verdict generatedLast checked 8d ago · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/zero
- Ops and product teams scheduling recurring jobs — digests, monitoring, board deck rebuilds — directly in Slack
- Sales and growth teams scoring inbound leads against an ICP and writing tiered results back to Sheets and HubSpot
- Engineering teams turning noisy Sentry alerts into grouped root causes with GitHub issues opened for the ones that matter
- Security reviewers who need sandboxed execution, network-layer secrets, and a per-run audit trail before an agent touches production
- Teams without a paid Slack plan if the Slack app is your only intended surface
- Buyers who want a flat monthly bill — every member needs a credit package on top of the plan fee
- Anyone wanting a simple chatbot rather than multi-step tool work that ends in an artifact
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Okou if your team wants a single flat-rate bill without per-member credit packages or usage overage, or if you need on-premise deployment or a terminal-based coding agent rather than a team-wide ops teammate.
Each member needs their own credit package ($20–$200/mo) on top of the plan fee — Pro at $20/mo alone doesn't include member credits, so a five-person team pays the plan plus five packages.
Free ($0, 1,000 credits valid 30 days) is enough to test a single workflow. Pro from $20/mo plus a $20–$200/mo member package per member fits a solo operator or a small team; Team from $180/mo (plan $160 + member package) fits a team of eight to twenty running agents daily. Cheaper flat-rate assistants and coding CLI subscriptions cost less per seat but reach far fewer tools built in and offer no equivalent audit trail.
In short
Zero — Okou is the AI teammate that plans and executes multi-step jobs across 4,000+ connectors and turns completed runs into reusable team. Best for Ops and product teams scheduling recurring jobs — digests, monitoring, board deck rebuilds — directly in Slack, Sales and growth teams scoring inbound leads against an ICP and writing tiered results back to Sheets and HubSpot, Engineering teams turning noisy Sentry alerts into grouped root causes with GitHub issues opened for the ones that matter. Free to start; paid plans from $20/mo.
What is Zero?
Zero — Okou is the AI teammate that plans and executes multi-step jobs across 4,000+ connectors and turns completed runs into reusable team. Best for Ops and product teams scheduling recurring jobs — digests, monitoring, board deck rebuilds — directly in Slack, Sales and growth teams scoring inbound leads against an ICP and writing tiered results back to Sheets and HubSpot, Engineering teams turning noisy Sentry alerts into grouped root causes with GitHub issues opened for the ones that matter. Free to start; paid plans from $20/mo.
Okou (rebranded from VM0; originally Zero) is a hosted AI teammate for teams rather than solo chat sessions. You hand it a plain-language job in Slack, the web app, Telegram, or by phone and SMS, and it works out the steps — read the finance sheet, group the Sentry noise, draft the Gmail follow-up — then returns a finished artifact instead of a chat reply. The connector catalog passed 4,000 and spans Google Workspace, GitHub, Notion, Linear, HubSpot, Meta Ads, Figma and Sentry, plus custom connectors over your own internal APIs, custom MCP connectors, and SSH access. The second pillar is turning completed runs into reusable workflows. When Okou spots a job that repeats, it offers to save the instructions and the tools the run reached for; any teammate then re-runs that workflow from chat or Slack under their own credentials, on a schedule, an email or calendar trigger, or a signed webhook. The workspace owns the library, so know-how stops living in one person's head. Runs end in deliverables: image generation, presentation and website generation, hosted-site publishing to a public URL, and downloadable file exports. Per-thread controls let you shift model, effort and speed mid-task, and admins set a workspace default model and provider while members bring their own LLM keys or attach an eligible personal Claude or Codex subscription. The most recent product releases added Discord and Google Docs/Sheets integrations, a Resources section, custom templates, and image annotations with private artifacts. The runtime is what gets agents past a security review — Firecracker microVMs with KVM isolation, secrets injected at the network layer so agent code never touches them, SHA-256 integrity on every run's HTTP traffic, and per-permission connector approval instead of a whole-token handover. Okou sits above chat-first assistants like Manus and apart from coding-tunnel tools like Codex or Claude Code: it reaches more tools natively and aims at team-wide operations, not
Key features
- Hosted AI teammate that plans and executes multi-step jobs from plain-language requests
- 4,000+ built-in connectors plus custom connectors over your internal APIs
- Custom MCP connectors and SSH access
- Reusable workflows saved from a completed run and re-run by any teammate under their own credentials
- Scheduled runs, email triggers, calendar/meeting triggers, and signed webhook triggers
- Org-shared agents (7) plus unlimited private agents per member
- Image generation, presentation generation, and website generation inside a run
- Image annotations and private artifacts
- Hosted-site publishing to a public URL plus downloadable file exports
- Channels: web app, Slack app, Telegram bot, and phone via iMessage, SMS, or MMS
- Per-thread model, effort, and speed controls; admins set a workspace default model
- Bring your own LLM keys, or connect an eligible personal Claude or Codex subscription
- Computer use: let an agent operate applications on a desktop you connect
- Voice input (speech-to-text) with per-member daily limits
- Firecracker microVM sandboxing with KVM isolation and network-layer secret injection
Behind the verdict
We'd reach for Okou the moment an ops or product team keeps rebuilding the same agent in a different person's chat window. The reusable-workflow angle is the real product: a run becomes a workspace asset that runs on a schedule or trigger under each member's own permissions. That is a different bet from the chat-first assistants — it assumes your team already lives in Slack and wants jobs finished, not conversations had. The second reason to pick it is the security posture. Firecracker microVMs with KVM isolation, secrets injected at the network layer, SHA-256 integrity on every run's HTTP traffic, and per-permission connector approval are the things that get an agent past a review board. If your blocker has been 'we can't let a bot hold production credentials', Okou was built for exactly that objection. Where it bites is the bill. Every member needs a credit package on top of the plan fee, so the headline $20 Pro price is a floor, not a total. Teams that want one flat monthly number will find the member-package model annoying to forecast — model it on 20,400–222,200 credits per member and auto-recharge against $1 per 1,000 credits. Free is genuinely useful for a trial but not for production: 1,000 credits expire in 30 days, two concurrent runs, and voice input capped at 10 lifetime requests. Pro lifts concurrency to 3 and voice to 300 requests/day; Team jumps to 10 concurrent runs and 500 requests/day. If you are running agents every day, the concurrency ceiling is what decides your tier, not credit volume. In practice, the Slack dependency is the quiet gotcha. If the Slack app is your only intended surface and you are not on a paid Slack plan, look elsewhere. Anyone wanting a simple chatbot rather than multi-step tool work ending in an artifact is also in the
Models under the hood
as of 2026-11-02
Limitations
- Concurrent runs are capped by plan — 2 on Free, 3 on Pro, and 10 on Team — and the plan fee is separate from per-member packages, with overage billed as pay-as-you-go credits.
- Voice input is metered per member per day (300 requests/200 min on Pro, 500 requests/500 min on Team), and Free credits (1,000) expire after 30 days.
- As an LLM-driven tool, outputs should be verified.
as of 2026-10-16
Researching Zero? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Zero still active?
Zero: the address we list now redirects elsewhere · last checked 14 Nov 2026.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Zero? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: November 2026
How we score →What do users say about Zero?
What people actually say about Zero — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
ResearchedDiscussed by users across 7 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store, Stack Overflow, Lemmy, Tech Press) · researched Oct 18, 2026.
Weighted by the 105 posts each of 7 sources contributed.
- +4,300+ built-in connectors across Slack, GitHub, Gmail, Sheets, HubSpot, Linear, and more
- +Firecracker microVM with hardware-level KVM isolation addresses the top enterprise security objection
- +Secrets injected at the network layer — agent code never sees credentials
- +Per-run HTTP/HTTPS audit trail with SHA-256 integrity for forensics and compliance
- +Per-permission connector approval instead of whole-token access reduces blast radius
- −No independent community validation of connector count, uptime, or artifact quality in this dataset
- −Rebrand from Zero to Okou makes the product nearly unsearchable amid keyword noise
- −Competing against Manus and Codex requires clear ROI evidence buyers can't yet find
- −Per-permission approval may slow onboarding for teams wanting quick broad access
- −Vendor-stated security claims are strong but unaudited publicly in the data
- • BYO-LLM keys shift inference cost to your provider
- • Enterprise SLA and support tiers not disclosed in available data
- • Personal Claude/Codex subscription eligibility varies by plan
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Zero — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 5 Nov 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Zero 12 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed who it suits, integrations, description, our verdict, summary, features, pricing tiers
- — changed pricing page, platforms
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed features, pricing tiers, description, summary, our verdict
- — changed SSL certificate, platforms, limitations, pricing page
- — changed features, our verdict, pricing tiers, who should skip it, who it suits, summary, description
Showing the 6 most recent of 12 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Zero cost in 2026?
Zero: Free to start; paid plans from $20/mo. Pricing last verified 5 Nov 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Zero tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | A solo operator or someone evaluating whether an agent can do real multi-tool work before committing budget.Adds: Free entry point: 1,000 credits (valid 30 days), 2 concurrent runs, all connectors, and 10 lifetime voice requests. |
| Pro | From $20/moVendor: “from $20/mo (plan $0 + member packages $20–$200/mo each)” | monthly | A solo professional or small team running agents most days but not yet needing enterprise controls.Adds: Adds 3 concurrent runs, BYO LLM keys, voice input (300 requests / 200 min per member per day), and email support; member packages range $20–$200/mo. |
| Team | $20–$200/moVendor: “from $180/mo (plan $160 + member packages $20–$200/mo each)” | monthly | A 5–20 person team running many agents in parallel across departments, with workflows shared in Slack.Adds: Raises concurrency to 10, higher voice limits (500 requests / 500 min per member per day), priority support; plan is $160/mo plus a $20–$200 member package per person. |
| Enterprise | Custom | quote | Larger organizations needing custom concurrency, advanced security, and a support SLA.Adds: Custom credit volume, custom concurrent runs, advanced security, dedicated support with SLA, volume and annual billing. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Zero's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Free ($0, 1,000 credits valid 30 days) is enough to test a single workflow. Pro from $20/mo plus a $20–$200/mo member package per member fits a solo operator or a small team; Team from $180/mo (plan $160 + member package) fits a team of eight to twenty running agents daily. Cheaper flat-rate assistants and coding CLI subscriptions cost less per seat but reach far fewer tools built in and offer no equivalent audit trail.
Who should pick Zero?
Pick Zero if you are Ops and product teams scheduling recurring jobs — digests, monitoring, board deck rebuilds — directly in Slack, Sales and growth teams scoring inbound leads against an ICP and writing tiered results back to Sheets and HubSpot, Engineering teams turning noisy Sentry alerts into grouped root causes with GitHub issues opened for the ones that matter, Security reviewers who need sandboxed execution, network-layer secrets, and a per-run audit trail before an agent touches production.
Look elsewhere if you are Teams without a paid Slack plan if the Slack app is your only intended surface, Buyers who want a flat monthly bill — every member needs a credit package on top of the plan fee, Anyone wanting a simple chatbot rather than multi-step tool work that ends in an artifact, Organizations requiring on-premise deployment.
Skip it if Skip Okou if your team wants a single flat-rate bill without per-member credit packages or usage overage, or if you need on-premise deployment or a terminal-based coding agent rather than a team-wide ops teammate.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Zero actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Set up a Monday-morning team digest in Slack: Okou reads shipped issues from the Linear board and specs from a shared Drive folder, writes the digest, and schedules itself for 9am every Monday.
Outcome: The digest posts automatically every week; when a teammate asks to add a source next Monday, Okou adds it and it appears in the following week's digest without rework.
Ask Okou to score the week's inbound leads against your ICP in Google Sheets, then queue Tier A contacts in HubSpot for owner follow-up.
Outcome: Twelve leads scored and written back to the sheet, four Tier A contacts queued in HubSpot — saving the manual spreadsheet pass and keeping owner assignment accurate.
Have Okou pull overnight Sentry events, group them by root cause, and open a GitHub issue only for groups over threshold, then assign the issue to whoever claims it in Slack.
Outcome: 1,111 events collapsed into eight root causes with two above threshold; issues opened for only those two and assigned on request, cutting alert noise drastically.
Use cases
- Automate a weekly team digest from Linear and Drive, posted to Slack every Monday morning
- Score the week's inbound leads against your ICP in Google Sheets and queue Tier A contacts in HubSpot for owners
- Group overnight Sentry noise by root cause and open GitHub issues only for groups over threshold
- Rebuild a board deck from the finance sheet in Google Sheets, refreshed the night before each board meeting
- Draft a website one-pager or storefront from a brand brief in Drive and publish it to a live URL
- Shift ad budget across underperforming ad sets in Meta Ads and hold the change for approval
- Write a product spec in Notion with customer quotes pulled and existing Linear issues linked
- Turn Slack decision threads into searchable Notion decision logs
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Zero — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Free-tier trial: about 15 minutes to create an account, connect one or two connectors, and watch a run end to end. Pro for a solo operator: 1–2 hours to connect the core stack (Google Workspace, Slack, a CRM) and save your first workflow. Team: half a day to a day, since you'll want per-member packages purchased, per-permission connector approvals set, and shared workflows and agents published
Switching to or from Zero
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From a coding agent like Claude Code or Codex: Okou's docs cover routing runs through an eligible Claude or Codex subscription and porting your skills onto workflows.
- →From Zapier or Make: rebuilt automations map to Okou workflows plus triggers (schedule, email, calendar, Notion, GitHub, webhook), and connectors replace per-app zaps.
- →From a bespoke Python + cron stack: push the script logic into a reusable workflow and Okou holds the credentials, sandbox, and audit trail.
- →From a chat-only assistant like Manus: re-create your recurring prompts as saved workflows so teammates can re-run them under their own permissions.
- ↗To a coding CLI (Codex, Claude Code): export run outputs and replay the logic as prompts, but expect to rebuild each connector glue by hand.
- ↗To an iPaaS like Zapier or Make: re-create workflows as zaps or scenarios; you lose the KVM sandbox and per-run SHA-256 audit trail.
- ↗To a flat-rate assistant: accept a narrower connector library and single-session runs in exchange for one bill with no per-member credit packages.
- ↗To a self-hosted agent framework: rebuild connectors, scheduling, and permissions from scratch; Okou doesn't offer an on-prem export.
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Zero”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Zero” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Zero.
Official links
What are the best Zero alternatives?
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genspark | Freemium | $20/mo | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Air AI | Contact Sales | Custom pricing | 14 Nov 2026 |
| Cryptohopper | Paid | $24.16/mo billed annually | 13 Nov 2026 |
Popular in Automation & Agents
Genspark
Genspark is an agentic AI workspace that turns one prompt into cited research, a slide deck, a live dashboard or a working app.
Air AI
Air's Enterprise Readiness platform turns defense readiness data into a live Readiness Graph that closes the gap between the frontline and
Cryptohopper
Cryptohopper combines an AI crypto trading bot with an MCP server that streams live ticker and orderbook data into Claude or ChatGPT.
Zero vs its closest rival
Zero's closest head-to-head is with Truleo.
Our Zero vs Truleo verdict written Jul 2, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
Head-to-head comparisons
Zero vs Truleo
Verdict being re-reviewed against current pricing and data.
Zero vs Locus Robotics
These are not competitors and no buyer shortlists them together. If you run a fulfillment center with spiky multi-customer volume and aisles wide enough for AMR traffic, Locus is the conversation — subscription-priced, WMS-integrated, staffed picking stations rather than lights-out. If your team lives in Slack and wants a hosted agent that chains Gmail, Sheets, Linear and Sentry into a finished artifact, look at Okou. Budget the two separately: Locus is a facilities decision, Okou is a per-seat software line item with credits on top.
GeneratedZero vs Presto Voice
Verdict being re-reviewed against current pricing and data.
Categories
Best-of guides
Topics
Used Zero? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.