Airgap vs Push Security

Push Security focuses on browser-based attack detection and AI governance. It deploys as a lightweight extension across Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, and enterprise browsers like Island, collecting high-fidelity telemetry. Autonomous hunting agents analyze this telemetry to write detection rules and deploy blocks in real time, covering AiTM reverse-proxy phishing, ClickFix clipboard injection, session hijacking, malicious OAuth consent flows, ghost logins, and illicit browser extensions. It also monitors AI prompts, file uploads, and shadow AI apps, with guardrails for MFA and password changes. Recent news (July 2026) highlights that agentic hunting benefits all customers by shipping collective detections, and the platform responded to a 'poisoned tenant' attack, showing real-world resilience. Airgap, in contrast, is a local document AI tool: it processes PDFs, DOCX, and other formats entirely on-device, offering chat, summarization, and cross-document search with zero cloud upload. It's suitable for air-gapped environments and offline use, with no integrations listed. While Push provides a browser-based security layer, Airgap provides a private AI workspace; they share only the 'AI' label.

Push Security is freemium, meaning you can start free and likely scale with usage or features, but exact paid tiers aren't specified here. Airgap is paid-only, but no pricing details are given. For a cost-conscious buyer, Push's freemium model reduces barrier to evaluation, while Airgap requires a purchase upfront. Consider your budget: if you need robust browser security but want to trial first, Push's free tier is attractive. If you need guaranteed privacy for document processing and are willing to pay for it, Airgap fits. Push's enterprise integrations (Okta, M365, Sentinel) imply larger cost at scale, but the freemium entry lets you validate value before committing.