Airgap vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-18
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionAirgapPush Security
PricingPaidFreemium
Best forLocal, private document AI for regulated industriesBrowser-based attack detection (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing) and AI governance
DeploymentOn-device installation, no cloudBrowser extension across multiple browsers
Key featuresLocal AI chat, summarization, offline searchReal-time threat hunting agents, session hijacking blocking, shadow AI discovery
IntegrationsNone listedOkta, Google, M365, Slack, Sentinel, Datadog, etc.
Recent newsNo recent newsAgentic hunting, July 2026 release, poisoned tenant attack response
Airgap
Airgap

Local document AI: query your PDFs, Markdown and text files with page-level citations — nothing leaves your machine.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the

Visit Website
Pricing
Paid
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
2 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Desktop
Web
Categories
❓ Document Q&A & Summarizing🔒 Security & Privacy📑 Document AI & Data Extraction
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Local document RAG over PDF, Markdown and text files
Page and paragraph citations linking answers to source
Source highlighting on cited passages
Portable, shareable vaults with a private per-vault vector index
Fully on-device pipeline — nothing uploaded to be indexed
Offline ingestion, retrieval and generation once models are cached
Five built-in local models: Llama 3.2, Qwen 2.5, Phi 3.5, Gemma 2
Bring your own GGUF model from any Hugging Face repository
Multilingual retrieval with a 100-language embedding model
Local inference via llama.cpp, models cached after one download
No hosted account, cloud workspace or relay between app and files
Vaults protected at rest by FileVault, BitLocker or LUKS disk encryption
Available for macOS, Windows and Linux
Optional connected-model mode (off by default) that sends questions to a hosted API
Works with Wi-Fi disabled for air-gapped environments
Real-time AiTM reverse-proxy phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser and Browser-in-the-Middle detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection that catches token theft bypassing MFA and passkeys
OAuth consent monitoring, consent blocking and app removal
Session hijacking and credential attack detection
Malicious browser extension detection, risk scoring and default-deny allowlisting
Extension supply chain change monitoring for ownership transfers and permission escalations
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection for Comet, Atlas and Dia
AI prompt and data-input monitoring with AI clipboard monitoring and blocking
AI file upload monitoring plus AI OAuth and agent permission monitoring
AI usage policy enforcement that blocks unsanctioned tools
Autonomous threat hunting agents that write detection rules and deploy blocks
Configurable response modes per control: monitor, warn or block
Browser DLP with file download, upload and clipboard telemetry and blocking
Integrations
Proofpoint
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack

What real users say: Airgap vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Airgap

50 mentions across 4 sources · 45% positive — mixed (averaged across 4 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Truly local processing ensures data never leaves your device.
  • • Offline capability makes it useful for air-gapped environments.
  • • Ideal for regulated industries with strict compliance needs.
  • • No data residency concerns, appealing to global enterprises.

What frustrates them

  • • Very few user reviews limit confidence in reliability.
  • • Setup requires technical knowledge, despite beginner claim.
  • • On-device AI may lag on large or multiple documents.
  • • Pricing unclear; no free tier or trial mentioned.

Researched Aug 24, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
  • • Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
  • • Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
  • • Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing

What frustrates them

  • • Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
  • • Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
  • • Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
  • • Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes

Researched Oct 14, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security operations analyst
    Pick: Push Security

    You need real-time detection of AiTM, ClickFix, and session hijacking with automated response, plus integrations with your SIEM.

  • Identity team lead
    Pick: Push Security

    You're fighting ghost logins and unmanaged MFA adoption; Push's in-browser guardrails and shadow AI visibility fit your mission.

  • Legal counsel
    Pick: Airgap

    Privileged documents must never leave your device; Airgap's local-only processing meets that requirement.

  • HR manager
    Pick: Airgap

    Handling employee records with strict confidentiality is safe with Airgap's offline, on-device AI.

  • Financial analyst
    Pick: Airgap

    Confidential reports can be summarized and queried without risking data residency issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do Push Security and Airgap overlap in functionality?

No. Push is a browser security platform for detecting attacks and governing AI use; Airgap is a local document AI for private Q&A. They serve different needs.

Can Airgap work in an air-gapped environment?

Yes, Airgap is designed for air-gapped setups since it runs entirely on-device with no cloud dependency.

Does Push Security require deploying a custom browser?

No. It works as an extension across standard browsers like Chrome, Edge, and Safari, so you don't need to force a single enterprise browser.

What recent updates should I know about Push Security?

In 2026, Push rolled out agentic threat hunting that shares detections across all customers, and they published a post-mortem on a 'poisoned tenant' attack they faced.

Is there any free trial for Airgap?

The data doesn't specify a free tier; Airgap is paid-only. Check the official site for trial options.

More Airgap or Push Security comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: August 24, 2026