Kastra vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Live tool data as of 2026-07-23
Reviewed by our team on
Saved

At a glance

DimensionKastraPush Security
Pricingfreemium · from Free $0/mofreemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual, up to 500 employees) or
Best forDevelopment teams running AI coding agents like Claude Code or Cursor who need to prevent destructive commands, Platform teams enforcing consistent governance across all AI agent actions in the organizationSecurity teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption
Standout featuresIntercepts every agent action before execution · Policy Decision Point (PDP) with sub-millisecond latency · Define custom policies for shell, file, network, database, browser actionsAdversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block
Viability score77/10095/100
APIYesYes

Kastra is the stronger pick for development teams running ai coding agents like claude code or cursor who need to prevent destructive commands; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).

Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-23.

Kastra
Kastra

Runtime authorization for AI agents — decide before actions execute.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security platform for AI-era attacks and AI tool control.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
Custom
Custom
$5/user/month (annual, up to 500 employees) or
Custom
Popularity
0 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
CLIAPIPluginDesktop
WebPlugin
Categories
💻 Code & Development🔒 Security & Privacy
🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Intercepts every agent action before execution
Policy Decision Point (PDP) with sub-millisecond latency
Define custom policies for shell, file, network, database, browser actions
Real-time approval workflows for sensitive actions
Audit trail with ed25519-signed append-only traces
Streams to SIEM (Datadog, Splunk, S3)
Kastra Recon scans agent history for past risky actions
Supports Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, OpenClaw
macOS GUI app and CLI for local Edge governance
Cloud control plane with US, EU, AP regions
Self-hosted and air-gapped deployment options
Post-inference validation (guard model outputs)
OpenClaw browser agent governance (clicks, form fills, navigation)
SDKs for TS, Python, Go, Rust, Java, Swift
Policy as code — typed, versioned, reviewed like code
Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block
ClickFix and ConsentFix detection and block
Session hijacking detection and block
Malicious OAuth integration detection and block
Ghost login and shadow SaaS discovery
Credential theft and compromised token detection
Autonomous threat hunting using browser telemetry
Real-time AI tool visibility and usage control
In-browser data loss prevention for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads)
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Malicious browser extension detection and block
Mobile phishing detection via SMS/QR codes
Browser-based incident investigation with session replay
Supports Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, Brave, Opera, Arc, and enterprise browsers
Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix (51 techniques)
Integrations
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
OpenClaw
Datadog
Splunk
S3
Okta
Azure AD
Google Workspace
Slack
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Splunk Cloud
SentinelOne
Webhooks
REST API

Who should pick which

  • Security team combatting phishing and shadow AI
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security detects and blocks AiTM, ClickFix, and session hijacking while providing visibility into AI tool usage and data leakage, all without requiring a proprietary browser.

  • Developer using Claude Code or Cursor
    Pick: Kastra

    Kastra intercepts agent actions in real time, enforcing policies on shell, file, and network operations without slowing workflows, and provides signed audit trails for compliance.

  • Platform team governing AI agent usage
    Pick: Kastra

    Kastra's Policy Decision Point and approval workflows allow centralized control over agent actions across a team, with streaming to SIEM for audit.

  • Identity team hardening MFA adoption
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's in-browser MFA registration guardrails and password change protection help enforce identity policies and detect ghost logins.

  • Compliance officer requiring agent traceability
    Pick: Kastra

    Kastra's ed25519-signed append-only audit trail ensures tamper-proof logs of all agent actions, meeting rigorous compliance requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Kastra or Push Security?

The best choice between Kastra and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.

What are the main differences between Kastra and Push Security?

The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.

Is there a free version of Kastra or Push Security?

Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.

More Kastra or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'

Explore each tool further

Kastra
View Kastra reviewKastra alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Code & Development toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.