Agentrq

Agentrq

Real-time human-in-the-loop task manager for Claude Code, Gemini, and ACP agents.

74/100Safe BetFree planFreemium

AgentRQ earns its keep as a free, open-source human-in-the-loop layer for ACP agents. The bidirectional task loop, sub-50ms SSE push, and visual approval board are concrete and practical, and the local speech-to-text and auto-titles are nice privacy touches. If you run Claude Code or Gemini CLI and want remote oversight without babysitting, it's a zero-risk trial. For deeper project management integrations, look to Linear or Jira instead.

Verified 5d ago · liveness 74/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/agentrq

Best for
  • Solo developers using Claude Code who need remote oversight and quick approvals from any device.
  • Teams running multiple ACP agents (Gemini, Cursor, etc.) wanting a single dashboard to coordinate efforts.
  • Developers building agentic workflows that require human checkpoints for production safety.
  • Engineering leads who want visibility into agent activity via heatmaps and tool-call history.
Not ideal for
  • Teams wanting fully autonomous agents with zero human intervention.
  • Non-developers seeking a no-code automation platform.
  • Users who need deep native integrations with tools like Slack, Jira, or email.
Visit Website

IntermediateFor a solo developer with Claude Code, first value in under 60 seconds: sign up, create a workspace, and paste one config snippet. For ACP agents via the gateway, expect 10-15 minutes to install and configure acp-gateway. Teams may need 30 minutes to set up multiple workspaces and the supervisor MCP.Web · APIAPI availableVerified 5d ago
Pricing
Free plan
FreemiumFree tier4 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
For a solo developer with Claude Code, first value in under 60 seconds: sign up, create a workspace, and paste one config snippet. For ACP agents via the gateway, expect 10-15 minutes to install and configure acp-gateway. Teams may need 30 minutes to set up multiple workspaces and the supervisor MCP.
Runs on
WebAPI
API available · 13 integrations
Who it's for
Solo developer using Claude CodeEngineering lead coordinating multiple agentsOpen-source maintainer self-hosting
Live sentiment
Is Agentrq actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip AgentRQ if you want fully autonomous agents with zero human intervention, need deep native integrations with Slack, Jira, or email, or you're a non-developer without CLI/MCP experience.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

During beta, all features are free, but pricing may change post-launch, so you may face new costs later.

Price reality

AgentRQ is free during beta, making it a zero-cost entry for solo developers and small teams using Claude Code or Gemini CLI. Compared to paid orchestration tools like ControlFlow or LangGraph, it's cheaper now but may introduce paid tiers later. For teams that already pay for Claude Code or GPT, AgentRQ adds oversight without extra cost.

In short

Agentrq — Real-time human-in-the-loop task manager for Claude Code, Gemini, and ACP agents. Best for Solo developers using Claude Code who need remote oversight and quick approvals from any device., Teams running multiple ACP agents (Gemini, Cursor, etc.) wanting a single dashboard to coordinate efforts., Developers building agentic workflows that require human checkpoints for production safety.. Free to use.

What's new in Agentrq

Checked 3 days ago

Across the latest 10 updates: 8 feature updates, 1 launch and 1 changelog entry.

FeatureBlog·5 days agoNewest

Message Send Delay: Brief buffer before agent messages

New per-workspace setting holds outgoing chat messages for a few seconds with Send Now and Cancel controls, allowing users to catch typos or reconsider before an agent acts.

FeatureBlog·10 days ago

Move tasks between workspaces with full history

Right-click a task to move it to another workspace, preserving chat history, tool calls, and attachments intact.

ChangelogBlog·11 days ago

MCP conformance suite testing catches and fixes bugs

Ran an independent MCP conformance suite against Core and Workspace MCP servers, fixed real bugs found, and added tests for edge cases where the suite was wrong.

FeatureBlog·14 days ago

Slack integration for team collaboration on tasks

Slack integration turns a workspace into a shared room: one private channel, every teammate's own agent, and every approve/deny action attributed to the person who clicked it.

FeatureBlog·16 days ago

Workflows without decision trees: routing by event

Workflows use no if/else or conditions. Routing is a lookup on (workflow, event), branching is a choice of event name, and loops are rejected at save time.

LaunchBlog·17 days ago

AgentRQ v0.4.0 adds Workflows pipeline

Workflows chain events and workspaces into a named pipeline you can draw or type, review before running, and execute in isolation. Agents coordinate via named events.

FeatureBlog·19 days ago

Tool Call History: searchable trajectory view

Every tool call and message on a task now lives in a searchable trajectory view with a 3-lane minimap and master-detail panel.

FeatureBlog·19 days ago

DeepSeek Harness plugin for remote task assignment

New plugin lets you assign tasks from the AgentRQ web app or phone, pushing them live into a running DeepSeek Harness agent without polling.

FeatureBlog·20 days ago

Local speech-to-text for task dictation

Speak task instructions instead of typing; transcription runs via local Whisper model in browser, no audio leaves device.

FeatureBlog·20 days ago

Workspace activity heatmaps for agent work patterns

Analytics page includes GitHub-style contribution heatmaps for task completions and messages, adapting from hour-by-hour to day-by-day as you zoom out.

What people actually say about Agentrq — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

12 mentions across 4 sources (Hacker News, Product Hunt, Bluesky, GitHub) · researched Jul 6, 2026.

43% positive57% critical
Recurring strengths
  • +Bidirectional task assignment between humans and agents is genuinely novel.
  • +Real-time SSE notifications under 50ms are fast and responsive.
  • +Open-source (Apache-2.0) and self-hostable gives full control.
  • +Free beta with no credit card required lowers adoption risk.
  • +Isolated workspaces per agent enhance security and focus.
Recurring frustrations
  • API inconsistency between REST and MCP cron validation causes confusion.
  • No native multi-agent routing across workspaces limits complex workflows.
  • Potential for spam abuse reported on Bluesky; no safeguards visible.
  • Limited community feedback outside HN and GitHub; support is minimal.
  • Documentation was still being written at launch time.
Patterns worth knowing
Bidirectional task assignment is highly praised
Seen on Hacker News
Multi-agent workflow limitations and request for routing
Seen on GitHub
API inconsistency causing bugs and confusion
Seen on GitHub
Learning curve
beginnerProductive in ~Under 60 seconds
Hidden costs people mention
  • Self-hosting incurs infrastructure costs (servers, storage).
  • Future paid tiers are expected but not yet announced.

Viability Score

74/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Agentrq? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
43
What the vendor publishes
40

Last calculated: September 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Bidirectional task assignment between agents and humans
  • Real-time push notifications via Server-Sent Events (sub-50ms)
  • Visual task board with list and Kanban views
  • Isolated workspaces with dedicated MCP endpoints
  • Supervisor MCP (mcp.agentrq.com) for orchestrating multiple agents
  • YOLO mode for auto-approving trusted tool calls
  • Tool Call History with searchable, filterable trajectory
  • Task Scheduling (one-time or recurring cron)
  • Events for auto-creating next task on completion
  • Workflows for chaining events and workspaces on a visual graph
  • Auto-title generation via in-browser local LLM
  • Speech-to-text via local Whisper model (audio stays on device)
  • Native Claude Channels push notifications (all Claude Code users)
  • Codex Gateway for OpenAI Codex integration
  • ACP protocol support for 39+ agents

About Agentrq

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableWeb · API

AgentRQ is a real-time agent-human task collaboration platform for developers and teams running Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and any ACP-compatible agent. It keeps a human in the loop with bidirectional task assignment: agents assign tasks to you, and you assign tasks back, so both sides move forward simultaneously. Each agent gets an isolated workspace with its own MCP endpoint, persona, and mission, and you can manage multiple agents in parallel from a single conversational dashboard. Connect in under 60 seconds—no credit card required during beta—and control everything from browser, phone, or tablet. AgentRQ routes notifications over Server-Sent Events with sub-50ms delivery, so agents hear back almost instantly without polling. The platform includes a visual task board (list or Kanban) to review context, approve actions, and redirect agents, plus a supervisor MCP at mcp.agentrq.com that orchestrates a fleet of workspaces. YOLO mode auto-approves trusted tool calls to speed up execution, and the system learns your preferences over time, escalating decisions when needed. Recent updates broaden reach: native Claude Channels push notifications are now available to all Claude Code users (no subscription required), and a new Codex Gateway connects OpenAI Codex agents. ACP-compatible agents like Gemini, Cursor, or GitHub Copilot connect through the open-source acp-gateway. The tool also added local, private conveniences: in-browser auto-title generation and speech-to-text for dictating tasks via a local Whisper model—audio stays on your device. Tool Call History gives a searchable trajectory of every tool call, and Workspace Activity Heatmaps show when agents actually work. AgentRQ is open-source (Apache-2.0) and self-hostable. It positions itself as a control plane that favors human oversight over full autonomy—ideal for scenarios where control and context are critical. Compared to fully autonomous agent platforms, it's a middle ground: agents run autonomously but

Behind the Verdict

AgentRQ is the control plane you didn't know you needed if you're running Claude Code or Gemini CLI and want to keep a human in the loop without chaining yourself to your desk. The bidirectional task assignment—agents ask you, you ask them—mirrors how real teams work, and the sub-50ms SSE push means you can approve a DB migration from your phone and watch the agent resume instantly. That loop is the product. Where it really shines is remote oversight. You're in a meeting, the agent hits a BLOCKED state, your phone buzzes with a decision request, you tap Approve, done. No context lost, no re-prompting. For solo devs and small teams juggling multiple agents, the workspace-per-agent model with dedicated MCP endpoints keeps context clean and prevents cross-talk. The visual Kanban board is a genuine command center, not a gimmick. But it's not for everyone. If you want zero-touch autonomy, look elsewhere—the human-in-the-loop ethos is the whole point. Non-developers will bounce off the CLI-heavy setup and the need to self-host for full control. And while the integration list is wide (39+ ACP agents), deep project-management features are thin: no built-in Slack or Jira sync, so you'll still rely on your own PM stack for heavy tracking. It's a task loop, not a project manager. Compared to fully autonomous agent frameworks, AgentRQ is the sane middle ground for production work. It's free during beta and open-source (Apache-2.0), so the risk of trying it is near zero. The recent additions—local speech-to-text, auto-titles, tool-call stack view, activity heatmaps—show a team that cooks with the needs of real agent operators. If you're already in the ACP ecosystem, this is the missing link between agents and the humans who trust them.

Researching Agentrq? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Agentrq actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Solo developer using Claude Code

You're on the go and need to review and approve a PR that Claude Code is working on.

Outcome: You get a real-time notification on your phone, open the task board, review the diff, and approve the merge. Claude Code resumes instantly, no context lost.

Engineering lead coordinating multiple agents

You have separate agents for backend and frontend, each with its own workspace.

Outcome: You use the supervisor MCP to assign tasks to both agents from one dashboard, monitor heatmaps, and step in when an agent needs a human decision.

Open-source maintainer self-hosting

You deploy AgentRQ on your own server to keep task data private.

Outcome: You connect Claude Code via MCP, run a local Whisper model for speech-to-text, and manage tasks without sending data to third-party servers.

Use Cases

  • Assign coding tasks to Claude Code from your phone and review progress in real-time.
  • Approve or block agent actions like PR merges or database migrations via a task board.
  • Run multiple agents in parallel with isolated workspaces for different projects.
  • Escalate decisions to a human when an agent encounters ambiguous requirements.
  • Use YOLO mode to auto-approve trusted tool calls for faster autonomous execution.
  • Connect Gemini CLI to AgentRQ via ACP gateway for remote human oversight.
  • Connect OpenAI Codex via the Codex Gateway for the same remote control.
  • Self-host AgentRQ to keep task data on your own infrastructure.

Models Under the Hood

Claude Sonnet 4.6

as of 2026-08-28

Limitations

  • AgentRQ is a free beta service requiring no credit card, providing real-time human-in-the-loop task management for AI agents like Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and other ACP-compatible agents.
  • The platform supports MCP-based integrations (Supervisor MCP, Workspace MCP) and a control plane UI for task management.
  • No native Slack, Jira, or email connectors are mentioned in the evidence.
  • Technical setup may be needed for advanced features, and pricing is free during beta.

as of 2026-08-21

Verification history

We have re-verified Agentrq 6 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Agentrq tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free Beta

$0/mo

Ideal for

Solo developers and small teams wanting to trial human-in-the-loop agent management with no cost and no credit card.

What this tier adds

Entry point during beta—all features included free, no credit card required, but no SLA or guaranteed support.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • During beta, all features are free, but pricing may change post-launch, so you may face new costs later.
  • Self-hosting requires your own infrastructure and maintenance—no official managed support beyond GitHub.
  • The free tier during beta may have usage limits that are not yet disclosed, so high-volume use could hit caps.
  • Technical setup for MCP and ACP may require paid support or consulting if you're not familiar with the stack.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Agentrq's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

AgentRQ is free during beta, making it a zero-cost entry for solo developers and small teams using Claude Code or Gemini CLI. Compared to paid orchestration tools like ControlFlow or LangGraph, it's cheaper now but may introduce paid tiers later. For teams that already pay for Claude Code or GPT, AgentRQ adds oversight without extra cost.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Agentrq — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

For a solo developer with Claude Code, first value in under 60 seconds: sign up, create a workspace, and paste one config snippet. For ACP agents via the gateway, expect 10-15 minutes to install and configure acp-gateway. Teams may need 30 minutes to set up multiple workspaces and the supervisor MCP.

Switching to or from Agentrq

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From Manual MCP setup: use AgentRQ's guided quick start to create workspaces and paste config snippets, replacing manual endpoint management.
  • From bare ACP gateway: connect your existing ACP agents to AgentRQ workspaces by adding the gateway config, gaining a UI and task board.
Migrating out
  • To a full automation platform: export your task history (via API) and replicate workflows in tools like ControlFlow or LangGraph if you outgrow human-in-the-loop.
  • To a project management tool: copy task descriptions and statuses manually into Jira or Linear if you need deeper PM integrations.

Integrations

Claude CodeGemini CLIOpenAI CodexDeepSeek HarnessCursorClineOpenCodeOpenHandsKimi CLIGitHub CopilotQwen CodeACPMCP

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Popular in Agent Frameworks & Orchestration

Temporal AI

Temporal AI

Durable execution platform keeping AI agents and workflows running through failures with automatic state capture and retries.

FreemiumTry
DBOS

DBOS

Durable execution for AI agents and workflows on Postgres

FreemiumTry
Sakana AI

Sakana AI

Autonomous multi-agent AI orchestration built in Japan for regulated enterprises

Contact SalesTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Agentrq? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.