Macro
Macro is a unified workspace that puts email, chat, docs, tasks, CRM and AI agents in one tab with team-level memory for agents.
For a startup already paying for Slack, Notion and Superhuman, Macro's $40/seat Pro plan is genuinely cheaper and gives your agents context those three tools can't. It's the rare all-in-one that isn't just a bundled pile of half-features — native email, sheets, CRM and coding agents in channels are real. Just confirm Outlook support before you commit, since Macro Mail connects to Gmail and Google Workspace only today.
Verified 5d ago · liveness 70/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/macro
- Seed-to-IPO startups replacing Slack + Notion + Superhuman with one system
- Teams whose AI agents need real workspace context to be useful
- 5-to-50 person companies that want native email, docs, CRM and sheets in one tab
- Engineering-led teams comfortable running or reading open-source infrastructure
- Teams standardized on Microsoft Outlook or custom IMAP/SMTP — Macro connects to Gmail/Google Workspace only
- Organizations that need HIPAA or FedRAMP on the hosted plan
- Companies that want zero vendor-branded email on Pro — the 'Sent with Macro' footer needs Max to remove
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Macro if your company runs on Microsoft Outlook or custom IMAP/SMTP, since Macro Mail only connects to Google Workspace and Gmail today and Outlook support is listed as coming soon.
Seats six and up cost $80/seat/month rather than the $40/seat/month headline, so growing past five people doubles the per-seat rate for everyone added after that
At $40/seat/month for the first five seats (then $80/seat/month), Macro is priced to beat a 5-20 person team's combination of Slack, Notion and a paid mail client like Superhuman. The free tier is personal-use only — no team features — so the real entry point for a company is the paid tier for every seat. Past five seats, the blended cost climbs toward enterprise workspace pricing from Notion or ClickUp, and 60+ seat teams should compare against existing contracts before assuming Macro is
In short
Macro — Macro is a unified workspace that puts email, chat, docs, tasks, CRM and AI agents in one tab with team-level memory for agents. Best for Seed-to-IPO startups replacing Slack + Notion + Superhuman with one system, Teams whose AI agents need real workspace context to be useful, 5-to-50 person companies that want native email, docs, CRM and sheets in one tab. Free to start; paid plans from $40/user/mo.
What's new in Macro
Checked 6 days agoAcross the latest 10 updates: 10 news mentions.
Why Macro Is Open Source
Macro explains its decision to open source the product.
Macro vs ClickUp
Macro publishes a comparison positioning itself against ClickUp.
How We Migrated Macro to Doppler and Made Configuration Safer
Macro migrates configuration management to Doppler.
Agents Attacking Documents with CRDTs
Macro details using CRDTs for agent-driven document editing.
The Macro Filesystem
Macro describes the design of its filesystem.
Building a GraphQL Cache That Doesn't Have to Fit in Memory
Macro engineering post on a memory-light GraphQL cache.
Getting Rate Limited for Fun and Profit
Macro engineering post on rate-limit handling.
Macro vs Slack
Macro publishes a comparison positioning itself against Slack.
Macro vs Notion
Macro publishes a comparison positioning itself against Notion.
Macro vs Linear
Macro publishes a comparison positioning itself against Linear.
What people actually say about Macro — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Macro on Jul 3, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Macro? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Unified inbox across multiple email accounts with AI triage and auto-tagging
- Keyboard-first email client with j/k/e shortcuts and drafting in your voice
- Share live email threads into team channels with permission inheritance
- Channel-based team chat with Signal (priority) and Noise (check later) sections
- Agents draft replies from emails, documents and call transcripts
- CRDT-backed markdown docs with real-time multiplayer and live agent edits
- Offline-first docs where edits apply locally and reconcile in the background
- Create tasks from any message or mention and link them to the spec
- Sheets and databases with live human-plus-agent collaboration
- Import Google Sheets and Notion databases via MCP
- CRM with contacts created from email and agent-updated deal stages
- Team-level memory built from workspace activity across tasks, emails, docs and calls
- Run Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and Gemini as coding agents inside channels
- Calls with recording and transcription
- Calendar, booking links, file storage and diagrams in the same workspace
About Macro
Macro is an open-source unified workspace that replaces the usual 27-app startup stack with one login: email, chat, docs, sheets, databases, tasks, calls, CRM, calendar, booking links, file storage and coding agents. It's aimed at seed-to-IPO startups and any team whose AI agents keep failing because they can't see the work. The company has raised about $30M led by a16z, with BoxGroup and 3kVC participating. Email is the front door. Macro Mail is a keyboard-first client with j/k/e shortcuts that pulls multiple accounts into one inbox, shares live threads into channels, and lets agents draft replies from your mail, docs and call transcripts. Chat splits into Signal and Noise, and @mentioning a doc or email thread grants that channel access to it. Docs are CRDT-backed with live agent edits, and tasks get created from messages and linked back to the spec. Everything hangs off one object graph, so team-level memory is built from real workspace activity and agents can read, edit and search what you can access. Bonus modules that most rivals skip: sheets and databases with Google Sheets and Notion import, CRM contacts auto-created from email with agents moving deal stages, call recording and transcription, booking links, file storage and diagrams. Against Notion plus Slack plus Superhuman, the pitch is one context layer rather than three tools that each know a third of what your team is doing. Code is AGPLv3 (moved from BSL on May 31, 2026), written in Rust and SolidJS, self-hostable, and backed by SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and CASA Tier 2.
Behind the Verdict
Most 'replace your whole stack' products fail because two or three of the modules are filler. Macro's aren't. Native email that shares threads into chat, CRDT docs that agents can edit, sheets and databases with import, and a CRM that builds itself from your inbox is a genuinely different shape than Slack plus Notion bolted together. Pick this if agent context is your bottleneck — Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and Gemini can run in channels, read the diff, and follow a task through to a pull request. The pricing is the easiest part to like. Macro's own calculator puts a five-seat Slack Pro + Notion Business + Superhuman Starter stack at $6,609/year versus $2,400/year on Macro Pro. Max at $200/seat/month is for heavy agent users — 10x Pro's AI usage and 1 TB storage — and most teams won't need it. Note that Free caps you at two connected email accounts and 5 GB, so it's a trial, not a deployment. Where it bites: Outlook and custom IMAP/SMTP aren't supported yet, which rules out plenty of companies outright. Free and Pro carry a 'Sent with Macro' email footer that only Max removes — a real annoyance for anyone emailing customers. And if you need HIPAA or FedRAMP on the hosted plan, the answer is a conversation, not a checkbox. The closest alternative is Notion plus Slack, and honestly if your team already lives happily in that pair, switching costs may not pay back. Macro's edge shows up when agents need to act on the same work humans do. Self-hosters get AGPLv3 and a real codebase, though the hosted version remains the company's focus and is where the iOS app and approvals live. We'd reach for Macro when you're a 5-to-50 person team with engineering DNA, tired of paying four vendors for partial context. Pass if you're Microsoft-standardized, or if you need a mature
Researching Macro? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Macro actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Sign up with Google, connect the company Gmail accounts into the unified inbox, and start triaging with j/k/e shortcuts and AI auto-tagging on day one. Invite the team, move active projects into channels, and let anything @mentioned inherit channel access automatically.
Outcome: One login replaces the email client, the chat app and the docs tool, and every new hire inherits project context by @mentioning a person or doc instead of being forwarded a pile of links.
Keep docs, tasks and calls inside Macro so the nightly build assembles team-level memory, then point agents at that memory to draft task updates, summarize call transcripts and answer questions about past decisions.
Outcome: Agents answer from real workspace context instead of a pasted-in summary, and the @link between docs, tasks and messages means a task update and the doc that motivated it stay connected.
Fork the AGPLv3 codebase, deploy it on internal infrastructure, and use Macro's filesystem access controls and channel-based sharing to scope who sees what — while routing anything needing HIPAA or FedRAMP through self-host@macro.com.
Outcome: The team gets the unified workspace without sending data to a third-party host, and accepts responsibility for the operations the hosted version would otherwise cover.
Use Cases
- Consolidate Slack messages, Google Drive files and Notion docs in one searchable workspace
- Onboard new team members by letting them query shared memory for past project context
- Reduce time spent switching between apps for task tracking, note-taking and communication
- Automatically link related messages and documents to current tasks without manual tagging
- Give AI agents unified context across email, docs, tasks and calls instead of siloed tools
- Replace a Superhuman subscription by triaging multiple accounts in one AI-native inbox
- Self-host an AGPLv3 workspace when hosted SaaS does not meet your requirements
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-14
Limitations
- Macro is a paid per-seat workspace: Free is $0 with AI usage 'Limited', 2 connected email accounts, 5 GB storage, and a 'Sent with Macro' email footer; Pro is $40 per seat/month with 'Standard' AI usage and 100 GB storage; Max is $200 per seat/month with 10× Pro usage and 1 TB storage.
- The pricing page lists Gemini Flash as the AI model on all tiers.
as of 2026-10-01
Verification history
We have re-verified Macro 8 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 8 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Macro tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/seat/mo
Ideal for
An individual trialing Macro for personal email and notes, with no team collaboration needed and no objection to a "Sent with Macro" signature on outbound mail
What this tier adds
Starting tier: free forever for personal use, includes connecting with Google but caps storage and AI, adds the "Sent with Macro" signature and excludes all team features
Pro
$40/seat/mo
Max
$200/seat/mo
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Macro's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
At $40/seat/month for the first five seats (then $80/seat/month), Macro is priced to beat a 5-20 person team's combination of Slack, Notion and a paid mail client like Superhuman. The free tier is personal-use only — no team features — so the real entry point for a company is the paid tier for every seat. Past five seats, the blended cost climbs toward enterprise workspace pricing from Notion or ClickUp, and 60+ seat teams should compare against existing contracts before assuming Macro is
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Macro — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Hosted: signing up with Google and connecting a Gmail or Google Workspace account takes minutes, and the inbox is usable immediately. Team onboarding — inviting people, creating channels and getting docs and tasks @linked — typically takes a day or two of active use to feel native. Self-hosting under AGPLv3 is a project rather than an afternoon, since you own deployment and operations.
Switching to or from Macro
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Notion: connect Notion via MCP and ask a Macro agent to import your docs into CRDT-backed Macro Documents
- →From Gmail: connect your existing Google Workspace or Gmail account directly, since Macro Mail is a client rather than a server
- →From Superhuman: the same j/k/e keyboard shortcuts are available, so triage habits carry over once your accounts are connected
- →From Slack: keep Slack connected via MCP while you move active channels into Macro's Signal and Noise model
- ↗To Notion: export Macro's markdown-based documents, since Docs are markdown under the hood
- ↗To Slack: no direct export path is documented, so plan on manually recreating channels and archiving history
- ↗To a standard mail client: because Macro Mail is a client over Google Workspace or Gmail, your mail stays with your provider when you leave
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Macro”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Macro” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Macro.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Macro
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Macro, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Macro vs Gem
If you are a knowledge worker drowning in app-switching, Macro’s open-source unification with shared memory (now AGPL/Rust) is a compelling free option. For recruiting teams needing an AI-powered all-in-one ATS/CRM, Gem’s agentic AI and deep HR integrations make it the clear winner—but only if your budget allows. These tools serve entirely different domains; choose based on whether your pain is productivity or hiring.
Macro vs Poke Interaction Co
Macro and Poke serve fundamentally different needs: Macro is for teams wanting a unified workspace with shared memory and deep integrations, now open-source and free. Poke is for individuals who want an AI assistant inside their messaging apps to manage email, calendar, and automations. Choose Macro if you need cross-app consolidation and collaboration; choose Poke if you prefer chat-based control and proactive automations.
Macro vs Guesty
If you're a knowledge worker drowning in app switching, Macro is your brain-saving unification layer. If you're a vacation rental host or property manager drowning in booking channels and guest messages, Guesty is your AI co-pilot. These tools serve entirely different jobs — choose based on your workflow, not feature lists.
Alternatives to Macro
View allSuperhuman
Superhuman is an AI email client, docs workspace, and Go assistant whose proactive agents run where your team already works.
Popular in Productivity
Genspark
Genspark is an agentic AI workspace that turns one prompt into cited answers, slide decks, dashboards and live web apps.
Poke (Interaction Co.)
Poke is an AI personal assistant that lives in your texts on Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram and RCS
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Topics
Used Macro? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.