useagent is live · free · last verified 14 Nov 2026 · viability monitor
useagent
Run Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode or Pi in self-hosted agentic coding workspaces with a full run log
Worth a trial if your team already pays for Codex or Claude Code and wants agent runs on servers you own. The Linux workstation per thread plus a replayable Postgres event log changes how you supervise agents — you audit and resume instead of guessing. Budget for real ops work and pin a tag: the README calls it alpha and schemas move between releases.
Verdict generatedVerified 1h ago · liveness 66/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/useagent
- Engineering teams already paying for Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode subscriptions
- Organizations that need agent runs on their own Linux hosts and their own Postgres
- Teams whose work mixes PRs, reports, spreadsheets and decks in one thread
- Platform engineers comfortable with Docker, Kamal and compose deploys
- Non-technical users who want a no-setup chat product
- Teams unwilling to operate and maintain their own infrastructure
- Anyone expecting bundled model access without a provider account or API key
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip useAgent if you want a managed product where the vendor hosts the workspace and bundles the model, rather than self-hosting the backend, gateway, frontend, and Postgres yourself and bringing your own Codex or Claude Code account.
Every run consumes tokens on your own ChatGPT plan or API key, so a long research or build task bills to your provider account, not to useAgent.
useAgent has no subscription of its own — the cost is whatever you already pay for Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, or Pi plus the Linux host and Postgres you run. That puts it below Devin, where Cognition bills the model and the workspace together, and below managed agent platforms that bundle tokens at a markup, but above a plain self-hosted CI runner because you're also paying for a platform engineer's time to stand up and maintain backend, frontend, gateway, and infrastructure.
In short
useagent — Run Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode or Pi in self-hosted agentic coding workspaces with a full run log. Best for Engineering teams already paying for Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode subscriptions, Organizations that need agent runs on their own Linux hosts and their own Postgres, Teams whose work mixes PRs, reports, spreadsheets and decks in one thread. Free to use.
What is useagent?
useagent — Run Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode or Pi in self-hosted agentic coding workspaces with a full run log. Best for Engineering teams already paying for Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode subscriptions, Organizations that need agent runs on their own Linux hosts and their own Postgres, Teams whose work mixes PRs, reports, spreadsheets and decks in one thread. Free to use.
UseAgent is an open-source agentic coding workspace that gives Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode or Pi a real computer to work on. You hand off a task from Slack, the web app or the API — a pull request, a research report, a spreadsheet — and each thread spins up an isolated Linux workstation with your repositories checked out, a terminal, a browser and a desktop you can open and take over mid-run. The engine is your choice, and so is the bill. Connect a ChatGPT account to run Codex on the plan you already pay for, paste API keys in Settings → Provider connections, or pick from the free model list that's always in the model menu. Keys are write-only and stay on your server, never inside the agent's sandbox. Because all four engines share one event format, threads, files and memory survive a swap from one to another. Team context rides along with the task. Skills imported from GitHub are versioned, so a run records exactly what it used; playbooks pin to tasks; knowledge, wiki pages and optional team memory sit beside the work with personal and organization scopes kept separate. A Postgres append-only event log captures every step, tool call and approval — replay a run, see who approved what, or recover a session after a restart mid-task. Sandboxes come from Daytona or a self-hosted CubeSandbox, and the whole stack deploys on any Linux box with Docker, Kamal and the local/prod compose files. Against Devin, the trade is ownership: Cognition hosts everything and bundles the model bill; UseAgent makes you bring a provider account and run the servers. It's for engineering teams that want agent output and run logs on machines they control, and who are comfortable pinning a tag on an alpha codebase.
Key features
- Isolated Linux workstation per agent thread with desktop, terminal and browser
- Runs Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and Pi behind one shared event format
- Self-host the full stack on any Linux box with Docker and Kamal compose files
- Daytona managed sandboxes or self-hosted CubeSandbox for data locality
- Connect a ChatGPT account to run Codex on the plan you already pay for
- Free model list always available in the model menu
- Write-only API keys stored on your server, kept out of the agent sandbox
- Screen recording of agent workstations to review what a run actually did
- Postgres append-only event log of every step, tool call and approval
- Replay any run and recover a session after a mid-task restart
- Versioned skills imported from GitHub that record exactly what a run used
- Playbooks pinned to tasks plus knowledge base and wiki pages
- Separate personal and organization memory scopes
- Slack mentions, threads and attachments with in-thread artifact delivery
- Recurring scheduled tasks with run history
Behind the verdict
Pick UseAgent when the blocker to adopting a coding agent isn't capability but ownership. If compliance has asked where your prompts and source code land, self-hosting the whole stack on a Linux box with your own Postgres answers that question directly. The second reason is the ledger: an append-only event log of every step, tool call and approval means you can replay a run and see who approved what, which matters more as agents take longer tasks. We'd also reach for it if the model bill is the sticking point. Running Codex against your existing ChatGPT account, or pulling free models from the model menu, keeps spend tied to accounts you already have instead of a bundled markup. Swapping engines without losing threads or memory is the quiet win — you're not locked to whichever agent you tried first. Pass if nobody on the team wants to own Docker, Kamal and compose files. This is infrastructure you operate, not a SaaS tab you open. Non-technical teams expecting a no-setup chat product will bounce off it, and anyone needing a frozen API should wait — the README is explicit that schemas can shift between releases. The closest alternative is Devin: Cognition runs everything in its cloud and folds the model cost in, which is simpler if you want zero ops. UseAgent trades that simplicity for control of the machines and the run history. If your source code can't leave your network and you have a platform engineer, the calculus favors UseAgent. In practice the daily caveat is babysitting. Alpha software with 219 open issues is not set-and-forget; pin a tag, watch releases, and expect to debug the odd session. The per-thread desktop and screen recording do make supervision easier than reading raw logs. Treat it as an agent you can audit, not a service you can forget.
Models under the hood
as of 2026-11-08
Limitations
- useAgent is self-hosted: a working deployment means standing up the full stack yourself on a Linux box with Docker and Kamal compose files, and Postgres is required for the durable append-only event log.
- It is an orchestration layer over existing agent engines — you must supply your own access (e.g. a ChatGPT plan for Codex, pasted API keys, or free models), which is a hard dependency and the real cost driver.
as of 2026-10-09
Researching useagent? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is useagent still active?
useagent is live · free · last verified 14 Nov 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is useagent? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: November 2026
How we score →What do users say about useagent?
What people actually say about useagent — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for useagent on Sep 23, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Only 4 of the posts we fetched could be positively tied to useagent. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about useagent — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 14 Nov 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified useagent 7 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed pricing tiers, summary, description
- — changed pricing page
- — changed description, our verdict, features, pricing tiers, summary, integrations
- — changed pricing page, limitations
- — changed features, who it suits, description, who should skip it, summary, pricing tiers, our verdict
- — changed pricing page
Showing the 6 most recent of 7 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does useagent cost in 2026?
useagent: Free to use. Pricing last verified 14 Nov 2026.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where useagent's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
useAgent has no subscription of its own — the cost is whatever you already pay for Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, or Pi plus the Linux host and Postgres you run. That puts it below Devin, where Cognition bills the model and the workspace together, and below managed agent platforms that bundle tokens at a markup, but above a plain self-hosted CI runner because you're also paying for a platform engineer's time to stand up and maintain backend, frontend, gateway, and infrastructure.
Has useagent's pricing changed?
No plan price for useagent has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick useagent?
Pick useagent if you are Engineering teams already paying for Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode subscriptions, Organizations that need agent runs on their own Linux hosts and their own Postgres, Teams whose work mixes PRs, reports, spreadsheets and decks in one thread, Platform engineers comfortable with Docker, Kamal and compose deploys.
Look elsewhere if you are Non-technical users who want a no-setup chat product, Teams unwilling to operate and maintain their own infrastructure, Anyone expecting bundled model access without a provider account or API key, Buyers who need frozen, stable APIs rather than an alpha codebase with schemas that shift between releases.
Skip it if Skip useAgent if you want a managed product where the vendor hosts the workspace and bundles the model, rather than self-hosting the backend, gateway, frontend, and Postgres yourself and bringing your own Codex or Claude Code account.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas useagent actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Deploys useAgent on an internal Linux box using Docker and Kamal compose files with the Terraform reference host, connects a ChatGPT plan for Codex, and wires the GitHub App so agents can clone repos and open pull requests.
Outcome: Agents start taking assigned code changes and landing PRs, and every run is recorded in the team's own Postgres timeline instead of a vendor's cloud.
Mentions an agent in a thread with a research question and attachments, then follows the run live and steps into the browser when it stalls on a paywalled page.
Outcome: A written report with sources lands back in the same Slack thread, and the screen recording shows exactly what the agent read along the way.
Schedules a recurring task to rebuild a weekly metrics deck from pinned playbooks and repositories, with an approval gate on the tool that writes to the shared drive.
Outcome: Each run pauses for a one-shot approval before publishing, and the run history in Postgres shows who approved what and when.
Use cases
- Ask an agent to research a topic in a real browser and return a written report with sources.
- Have an agent build and hand back a finished website or landing page.
- Generate a spreadsheet or deck from your team's repositories and pinned playbooks.
- Assign an agent a code change and open a pull request when it is done.
- Deploy a self-hosted agent workspace connected to your internal repositories.
- Step into a running agent's desktop or terminal mid-task to redirect or unblock the work.
- Mention an agent in Slack, send attachments, and receive the finished artifact in the thread.
- Schedule a recurring task and inspect its run history in Postgres-backed sessions.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of useagent — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
A platform engineer who knows Docker and Kamal can typically get a local compose stack running on a laptop in an afternoon, but a production self-host with backend, frontend, gateway, Postgres, and a Terraform-provisioned host is realistically a few days of work. Connecting Slack, the GitHub App, and provider keys is the fast part once the base stack is up; teams without a platform engineer
Switching to or from useagent
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Devin: move the same tasks into useAgent threads, keep your Codex or Claude Code subscription, and point the GitHub App at the repos Devin was touching so pull requests keep landing in your own account.
- →From a hosted coding-agent SaaS: self-host the backend, frontend, gateway, and Postgres on your own Linux host, then reconnect Slack and your OAuth providers.
- →From a raw terminal coding agent: keep the same CLI engine, add the isolated Linux workstation and Postgres event log so runs become replayable and reviewable.
- →From a chat-only LLM workflow: route the same requests through Slack or the API so outputs arrive as files, spreadsheets, and pull requests instead of pasted text.
- ↗To Devin: hand the same engineering tasks to Cognition's hosted agent and let them bundle the model bill and the workspace, giving up the self-hosted Postgres run log.
- ↗To a plain CI/CD runner: keep only the deterministic build and test steps and drop the autonomous agent layer if your work does not end in files or PRs worth reviewing.
- ↗To a managed agent platform: move to a vendor that hosts the workspace and bills tokens through them if you no longer want to run backend, gateway, and Postgres yourself.
- ↗To terminal-only agent use: keep Claude Code or Codex directly in your existing dev containers if you do not need Slack intake, screen recording, or an approval-gated tool layer.
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “useagent”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “useagent” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about useagent.
Official links
What are the best useagent alternatives?
The closest alternatives to useagent we list are Devin, Paseo and Ellipsis. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Devin | Paid | Pricing not published | — |
| Paseo | Free | Free | — |
| Ellipsis | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to useagent
View all
Tools that pair well with useagent
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside useagent, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Devin
Devin is an autonomous AI software engineer that plans, codes, tests, and ships mergeable pull requests on its own.
Paseo
Self-hosted control plane that runs Claude Code, Codex, Copilot and 30+ coding agents from desktop, phone or browser
Ellipsis
Run Claude Code and Codex cloud coding agents from YAML in your repo, with spend caps and full logs
useagent vs its closest rival
useagent's closest head-to-head is with Genspark — These are different bets, not two flavors of one product. If you want synthesis and content output without touching infrastructure — cited summaries, decks, sheets, podcasts — Genspark wins, especially with Gen-1 Slides and the open-source GenOffice suite landing in 2026. If your team already pays for Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode and needs those agents to run on your own Linux boxes with work arriving in Slack and PRs, useAgent is the sharper fit and costs nothing in license fees. Pick Genspark for breadth and zero setup; pick useAgent for control, locality, and Slack-native agent operations. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Useagent vs Genspark
These are different bets, not two flavors of one product. If you want synthesis and content output without touching infrastructure — cited summaries, decks, sheets, podcasts — Genspark wins, especially with Gen-1 Slides and the open-source GenOffice suite landing in 2026. If your team already pays for Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode and needs those agents to run on your own Linux boxes with work arriving in Slack and PRs, useAgent is the sharper fit and costs nothing in license fees. Pick Genspark for breadth and zero setup; pick useAgent for control, locality, and Slack-native agent operations.
GeneratedUseagent vs Poke Interaction Co
These aren't competitors — pick the one that matches your problem, not by comparing specs. If you run an engineering org whose agents need a real Linux box, terminal, browser and self-hosted data locality, useAgent is built exactly for that; it's free/open-source but expects you to wire your own provider account and infra. If you want email, calendar and reminders handled inside the messaging app you already text from, Poke is the fit — and its recent move to Cognition means it now shares the Devin house. Don't buy either hoping to do the other's job.
GeneratedUseagent vs Temporal Ai
These two solve the same problem from opposite ends and rarely get bought together. Temporal is what you choose when your own developers are writing agent or service code and you need the execution itself to be crash-proof — retries, timeouts, versioning, replay, and Saga compensation as first-class primitives across eight languages. useAgent is what you choose when your team already pays for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, or Pi and just wants each thread to have its own Linux computer, browser, and file output, with Slack and GitHub as the surface. If you're building agent infrastructure, buy Temporal. If you want non-engineer-friendly output like decks, spreadsheets, and PRs from agents you already license, useAgent is the free path. Don't buy Temporal as a useAgent replacement or vice versa — the fit is fundamentally different.
GeneratedUseagent vs Air Ai
These aren't competitors — picking between them isn't a decision anyone actually faces. Air is a defense readiness platform for commands and program offices, sold on a contact-us basis with vendor-led deployment; the value is in compressing materiel release and due-diligence timelines inside Army, DCMA, and Air Force workflows. useAgent is a free, open-source layer that gives Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Pi their own cloud Linux workstation, aimed at engineers who already pay for those agents and are willing to run infrastructure. If you're a defense logistics buyer, evaluate Air. If you're an engineering team wanting agent runs to land as PRs and Slack artifacts, evaluate useAgent. There is no overlap budget to weigh.
GeneratedUseagent vs Cryptohopper
These products do not compete. Cryptohopper is a paid SaaS that automates spot crypto trading across exchanges with Copy Bot, signals, and a marketplace of strategies — you configure it and it trades. useAgent is a free, open-source workbench that wraps Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Pi with their own isolated Linux computer so engineering teams can run agent work that lands in Slack, GitHub, and OAuth-connected apps. A crypto trader buys Cryptohopper; a platform engineer adopting useAgent is solving a completely different problem. If you are choosing between them, the answer is that you likely need one and not the other.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Categories
Best-of guides
For makers of useagent
- Get a Verified Listing for useagent ($39): a written decision within 1 working day.
- Free listing for another tool: Free reviews are decided in order, within 3 weeks of the review starting.
Used useagent? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.