Command Center

Command Center is aimed at a specific failure: teams adopted coding agents faster than they adopted a review process. The product's core move is reframing review. A 2,847-line addition / 891-line deletion agent diff becomes 97 ordered steps you move through with Tab and Shift+Tab, so a hybrid BM25 + dense retrieval change, a cross-encoder reranker swap, and an SSE streaming query handler each get reviewed as a concept rather than as scattered hunks. That is a real workflow change, not a coat of paint. Strengths. Multi-agent in one session is the quiet differentiator. If you already run Claude Code and Codex, you currently pay a context-switching tax every time you compare output; Command Center puts them side by side with per-agent draft messages that don't clobber each other when you switch. Version 1.2.0 let coding agents drive the UI — create a workspace, create an agent in it, and navigate to a diff of any file and range, for Codex and Claude Code. Version 1.2.2 extended workspaces and walkthroughs to PRs made from a fork of the main repo and gave agents the ability to show or hide files in the diff viewer, which is how you get a test-heavy PR down to the files that matter. Git operations were sped up substantially in the same release, and since diffs run constantly, that shows up everywhere. The refactoring agent is the other half. Duplicate setup, hardcoded secrets, oversized functions, and general maintainability debt get swept before merge, and failed runs are refunded in credits — an honest touch that matters when you're paying per run. Fit. Staff and senior engineers who need to get through a 1,000+ line agent PR in one sitting, and teams running two or more coding agents. Open-in-editor covers Neovim, Emacs, and JetBrains, so it slots into existing editing setups rather than replacing them; GitLab support accepts an existing glab CLI login. Where it doesn't fit. It is a desktop companion, not an IDE or a cloud workspace — no browser-based dev environment here, and solo developers on small repos won't get much from a 97-step walkthrough of a 200-line change. There is also deprecation drift to watch: the Subagents and Commands pages were soft-deprecated in 1.2.0 because Claude Code's Skills replace them, and the model roster keeps moving (Opus 5, Sonnet 5, and GPT 5.6 came in at 1.2.0 for walkthroughs and refactorings; Fable 5.1 was added at 1.2.2 with Opus 4.8 and 4.7 retired). The install base is narrow too — Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 are blocked by the installer. Pricing sits at the low end for a tool in this category: $0/mo Free, $9/mo Starter, $19/mo Pro. For a team already paying for two or three coding agents, that is a rounding error against the review time it claims to save — provided the walkthrough model actually matches how your team reads code.