
AI-powered site reports & meeting minutes for architects, engineers, and consultants.
By Tanmay Verma, Founder · Last verified 03 Jul 2026
In short
there — AI-powered site reports & meeting minutes for architects, engineers, and consultants. Best for Architects creating site reports after field visits, Engineers writing OAC meeting minutes, Construction consultants producing field documentation. Free to start; paid plans from $33/mo.
See what real users actually say. We scan live discussions, reviews and complaints across the web and hand you an honest verdict — in under a minute.
3 free scans · no card needed · downloadable report
If you produce site reports or meeting minutes weekly, there.do will save you hours per week. Its AI is embedded directly in the document, not a separate chat, and the read tracking is a genuine differentiator. But it's useless for general writing — you wouldn't draft a proposal or a contract here.
Compare with: there vs Fellow, there vs Read.ai, there vs Jamie
Last verified: July 2026
Across the latest 6 updates: 1 feature update, 1 changelog entry and 4 news mentions.
Postmortem of there's first major technical incident, detailing causes and fixes.
Fixed critical bug preventing note creation/loading on mobile, content loss after AI edit, Android keyboard reopening.
Export documents as PDFs to OneDrive from sharing panel. Comments anchored to content in margin. Mobile bug fixes.
List of recommended construction site report tools, positioning there.do as a solution.
Podcast episode discussing the product vision and solving document pain points.
Answers to common questions about construction site report software for architects.
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
47 mentions across 3 sources (Hacker News, Lemmy, Tech Press).
How likely is there to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 4 signals — momentum (how recently it shipped), wrapper dependency, revenue model, and web presence.
Last calculated: July 2026
How we score →there.do is a vertical SaaS tool purpose-built for architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) professionals to create, share, and track site reports and OAC meeting minutes. It replaces manual Word workflows with a mobile-first capture system: take photos, record voice notes, and log tasks on-site, then drag them into documents on the web. AI assists by summarizing voice recordings, rephrasing text, proofreading, and formatting — all within the editor, not a separate chat. Sharing is equally streamlined: auto-compressed PDF with AI-written email, branded signature, read tracking, and the ability to lock documents after contractual deadlines. The tool also offers e-signature, margin-anchored comments, and versioning. Notably, there.do is not a general document editor; it's a focused pipeline for field-to-office reporting. Competitors like Notion or Office 365 require stitching together separate tools for capture, formatting, and tracking — there.do wraps them in one flow.
there.do is a rare example of a tool that solves one specific problem exceptionally well. The core workflow — field capture on mobile, then drag-and-drop organization on desktop — eliminates the most tedious parts of report writing. AI summarization of voice notes works reliably, and the ability to rephrase or proofread directly in the editor keeps you in flow. But the real magic is in the sending and tracking: the AI writes a professional email, compresses the PDF, and gives you read receipts plus one-click reminders. In practice, we'd reach for this when producing weekly construction reports or minutes for the owner-architect-contractor (OAC) meetings. The mobile app is solid offline, and the recent addition of OneDrive export (Business plan) addresses a key enterprise request. However, there.do is not cheap once you need more than 5 documents per month — the Pro plan at $33 gets you 15 documents, but the Team plan at $119 is $1.19 per document if you max out at 100. That's fine for a construction firm charging clients per report, but not for a small team on a tight budget. The biggest caveat: this tool is only for AEC documentation. If you need to write any other kind of document, use Google Docs or Word. Also, free plan limits to 5 documents/month, which is just enough to evaluate. Compared to alternatives like SpecLink or Procore, there.do is lighter — it's not a full project management suite. It complements them as a reporting layer. The latest changelog shows active development: OneDrive integration, better comments, and fixes for critical mobile bugs. The transparency around a recent major incident (documented on their blog) is refreshing. Overall, we'd pick there.do over Word + manual email for any AEC team producing regular site reports.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Helpful link from there.do
Helpful link from there.do
Helpful link from there.do
Helpful link from there.do
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside there, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Used there? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.